I Survived My First Year of Law School. Woot.
I've resolved to try to ditch this mindset of “what comes next?” It feels like the fastest route to burnout—a path well-traveled by many in the legal profession.
May 15, 2019 at 01:17 PM
5 minute read
My 1L life is officially over. I finished my first year of law school with a click of the “submit” button on a five-hour, take-home Torts exam in a nearly empty library last Thursday afternoon.
I'm glad to check it off the list, but with all the hysteria surrounding the first year of law school, its ending was anticlimactic. I can't say I felt any huge weight lift upon closing out of that last exam—there's so much more I still have to do.
Part of the problem is that I'm still in Ann Arbor, Michigan, for one more week, struggling through the Law Review write-on competition, so it hasn't quite set in yet that I don't have to open a casebook for a few months.
Instead of rejoicing at my near-freedom, I keep thinking ahead about what's next on my to-do list: sorting out my course schedule for next year, trying to do well at my summer job (I'm allowed to do real-life legal work already?), researching 2L summer job prospects (on-campus interviews are in July), contemplating what practice areas and type of work I might like, and so on, forever. All of this despite not knowing if I actually passed Torts yet.
Being prepared for the future is important, of course, but I've resolved to try to ditch this mindset of “what comes next?” It feels like the fastest route to burnout—a path well-traveled by many in the legal profession, from what I can tell, given the pressure to hustle to the top of the curve in law school, and then hustle to the top of the hierarchy in Big Law, in perpetuity.
So, with my quota for existential panic hereby reached, I'll look backward instead of forward, reflecting on the dreaded 1L year.
First semester flew by, compared with second semester. The beginning of the school year was wildly busy with efforts to get a sense of how to keep up with readings and prepare for class at the most basic level. I went through at least four different note-taking schemes before settling on the simple, yet elegant, “reading notes in blue pen, class notes in black pen.”
The fall semester was also interesting in that most 1Ls seemed equally and intensely afraid of the mysterious law school final exam, but they were also equally hopeful. Someone had to be at the bottom of the curve, yes, but someone also got to be at the top, right?
Second semester, in contrast, seemed to drag on and on. Readings were still long and dense, but the novelty to them was gone, and I think everyone had figured out their personal approach to assignments by then. The fear of exams was significantly mitigated, too. Not only did we now know what an exam looked like, but it was also pretty clear that there was no secret formula–no single thing (or really, any combination of things) that could possibly ensure one person's grade was better than that of someone else.
Don't get me wrong, people still cared and worked hard, but the mystery was gone, and, frankly, the optimism was too. Since there's no secret to doing well, we basically just had to shrug and do the best we could all semester and hope the professor liked whatever we cobbled together in those defining few hours of an exam.
Among the other factors that made second semester seem so long was the Michigan winter, obviously. Also, the social dynamics that develop from sitting in class with the same group of 80 people every day, for so many days, can be rather strange. First-year students are necessarily all focused on the exact same things—going through the same studying motions, reading the same cases, having the same academic discussions. In the second and third years of law school, there is much more variety in classes and extracurriculars. But we 1Ls (despite a great deal of person-to-person diversity in terms of age, background and personality) have, with few exceptions, been living unnervingly similar and monotonous lives for the past year.
My biggest complaint about this 1L bubble wasn't the oft-criticized “vacuum of ideas” in higher education—civil procedure and contracts doctrines rarely evoke strong debate, regardless of the political leanings of the people in the classroom. No, my grievance is with the vacuum of conversation topics. I don't watch Game of Thrones (leave me alone), and I need a very long break from jokes about Pennoyer v. Neff, Palsgraf, Rose 2d of Aberlone, Learned Hand and other staples of the 1L curriculum. (“Jokes” may be an overly generous description.)
All that aside, I do feel I learned a lot as a 1L. I would even call much of it interesting, not only preparing me for a legal career but also making me more informed on how the world works and the law's role in it. Personally, I have no regrets about coming to law school, although I know some of my classmates feel differently.
Of course, even one year in, I have no idea how my 1L knowledge will translate to my ability to actually practice law. For an update on that, you'll have to check back in September for the first “My 2L life” column, after I've had taken a stab at working in a law firm environment. I can't promise that column will be free of existential panic, but fingers crossed.
Renee Griffin is a student at University of Michigan Law School. Her column will return in the fall as “My 2L Life.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions During Q&A
The Growing Antitrust Scrutiny of DraftKings and FanDuel
What Qualities Will Distinguish Good from Great Service In 2025?
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250