Jenner Partner Kenneth Lee Confirmed to Ninth Circuit Bench Over Calif. Senators' Objections
Lee, the fifth of Trump's Ninth Circuit nominees to be confirmed, won senate approval despite opposition from his home state of California, whose Democratic senators raised concerns about his delayed disclosure of controversial college writings.
May 15, 2019 at 06:35 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
In a 52-45 vote, the U.S. Senate on Wednesday confirmed Los Angeles Jenner & Block partner Kenneth Lee to a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit despite the opposition of his home state California senators.
Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris announced their opposition to Lee earlier this year, declining to return so-called blue slips to indicate their signoff on his nomination while it was before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where both senators sit in the minority. They cited Lee's failure to hand over “controversial writings” from his college days to their home-state screening committee and his initial failure to disclose the writings to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
In his writings, Lee was critical of some affirmative action policies, took a supportive position of a professor accused of sexual harassment, and defended President Ronald Reagan's response to the AIDS crisis. He distanced himself from the writings during testimony before the Senate Judiciary in March. “When you're 18 or 19 you think you know everything even though you really don't,” Lee said. “I like to think I've matured as a person over the past two and half decades.”
Lee is coming to the bench after stints in both government and private practice. He was a summer associate at some of the nation's most elite firms—Kirkland & Ellis; Munger, Tolles & Olson; Cravath, Swaine & Moore and Latham & Watkins—prior to clerking for Fifth Circuit Judge Emilio Garza. He worked as an associate at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and then as an associate counsel in the George W. Bush White House. Lee joined Jenner as a partner in 2009.
According to Lee's Senate questionnaire, he made $300,000 in capital contributions to Jenner & Block and had $160,416 in the firm's “cash balance fund” as of January of this year. According to his financial disclosures, he made $962,480 at Jenner in 2016, $832,480 in 2017, and $860,576 in 2018. As of the Feb. 8 filing, he had made $193,991 in 2019. (The American Lawyer reported that Jenner's average profits per equity partner were $1.5 million in 2018.) Of note for his upcoming time on the Ninth Circuit bench, Lee disclosed significant stock holdings in Amazon, Microsoft and Bank of America.
Lee's confirmation means that the Ninth Circuit, a court that has come under frequent criticism from President Donald Trump for ruling against his administration, now will have five Trump appointees among its 26 current active judges. Judge Bridget Bade, who previously served as a magistrate judge in the District of Arizona, was confirmed to the court in March in a 78-21 vote. Trump also appointed Circuit Judges Mark Bennett, Ryan Nelson and Eric Miller to Ninth Circuit seats based in Hawaii, Idaho and Washington, respectively.
Trump's first nomination to the court—federal prosecutor Ryan Bounds of Oregon—was withdrawn shortly before a scheduled vote by the full Senate last July. The president's nomination of Munger Los Angeles partner Daniel Collins passed out of the Senate Judiciary alongside Lee's and remains pending in the full Senate.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump-Appointed Judge Presides Over NASCAR Antitrust Dispute Under Case Reassignment
3 minute readFTC, DOJ Withdrawal of Antitrust Guidelines for Collaboration Infuriates Republicans
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Luigi Mangione's Attorney Gives a Master Class in How Not to Handle a High-Profile Case in the Media
- 2Trump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
- 3Trump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
- 4Call for Nominations: The Recorder and Law.com's California Legal Awards 2025
- 5The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250