Matters that were discussed in chambers during a recent evidence hearing in the Harvey Weinstein criminal trial in Manhattan will remain sealed, an Appellate Division, First Department panel ordered Thursday.

Associate Justices David Friedman, Judith Gische, Troy Webber, Ellen Gesmer, and Peter Moulton issued an order denying an Article 78 petition on behalf of a number of media organizations seeking to have the proceedings closed by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice James Burke unsealed and made public.

The order addressed two separate filings—one from Court TV; the other from a coalition of news organizations, including the New Yorker, New York Post, CNN, and the AP—that argued the evidence being discussed during the Molineux/Sandoval hearing on April 26 deserved to be made public. On top of First Amendment arguments, the panel noted the petitioners argued that the global interest in and media coverage of the Weinstein case meant the public was already familiar with whatever salacious material was discussed after Burke closed the courtroom.

Not so, the panel said: "Contrary to petitioners' suggestion, the People have represented that some of the information has not yet been made public."

The Molineux/Sandoval hearing was necessitated by the office of Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr.'s desire to introduce and use evidence at trial related to alleged bad acts committed by Weinstein but which aren't related to the criminal charges against him. Echoing Burke's comments from the bench ahead of closing the courtroom, the panel pointed out the evidence reviewed may never be used at trial, and that the publicity detailing that potential evidence would serve to potentially undermine Weinstein's right to a fair trial.

Burke, the panel said, "reasonably concluded that the sealing of documents relating to this single pretrial hearing was the only way to prevent tainting the jury pool with such inadmissible, prejudicial information."

What, if any, evidence ultimately is determined by Burke to be admissible will "become public if and when it is introduced at trial," the panel stated.

Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins name attorney Barry Kamins, who is part of the legal team representing Weinstein, applauded the appellate panel's decision "upholding the defendant's right to a fair trial."

Court TV was represented by Ballard Spahr associate Jacquelyn Schell. The media coalition was represented by Davis Wright Tremaine partner Katherine Bolger. Neither attorney responded to a request for comment on the appellate panel's decision.

Weinstein faces multiple counts of predatory sexual assault, criminal sexual acts and rape. He is now expected to go to trial Sept. 9.

Related: