Former Lawyer Loses Key Battle in Paul Weiss Discrimination Claim
A nondisclosure agreement was in spotlight after former lawyer Anna Christie appealed a tribunal's decision stopping her from calling another woman as a witness.
May 20, 2019 at 12:50 PM
3 minute read
A former Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison lawyer has failed to overturn a decision by an employment tribunal that stopped her from calling a witness to back up her claims of discrimination at the U.S. firm's London office.
The employment appeals tribunal upheld the decision made last week that former Paul Weiss lawyer Anna Christie, who is pursuing claim of about $1.7 million against the firm, would not be allowed to submit a witness order to another female Paul Weiss lawyer.
The witness, corporate lawyer Sonia Larsen, had been lined up by Christie to back up Christie's claims of a culture of discrimination and a hostile environment for women at the firm's London office, the tribunal heard.
Christie had been a corporate lawyer at Paul Weiss until she was sacked on February 2018, according to court documents. She alleged that she was fired due to sex discrimination which she said amounted to harassment or victimization, adding that she also suffered religious discrimination because she received fewer paid holiday days than Jewish staff.
Larsen had also lodged a claim against the firm, but the employment appeals tribunal heard on Monday that she had since signed a non-disclosure agreement with Paul Weiss after Christie's witness order was submitted.
Judge Jennifer Eady ruled Monday that in this case the employment tribunal was “obviously troubled” that Larsen had entered into an NDA with Paul Weiss. She added however that the employment tribunal (ET)”was not concerned with the issue of NDAs as a whole.”
She said that not knowing the detail about what Larsen knew about the matter at hand made it difficult to know whether there is a broader public interest in granting a witness order.
She added: “I consider that the ET did nothing but include a permissible step in its decision.”
Christie had argued that Larsen had been pressured into signing an NDA, something that was “strongly denied” by Paul Weiss legal representative Paul Epstein QC of Cloisters.
Epstein added: “Many of the matters [Christie] has put forward as facts are hotly contested.”
Paul Weiss and the head of its London office David Lakhdhir argue that Christie was fired for taking up a full-time PhD program at Cambridge University without telling the firm, as well as alleged performance issues, the tribunal heard.
The full hearing continues.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250