'Happiness' Tips Doled Out to Skadden Lawyers
Yale University professor Laurie Santos, who teaches a wildly popular course on happiness, says that in order to be happy, lawyers need to work at it.
May 22, 2019 at 05:09 PM
4 minute read
Laurie Santos teaches the most popular class in the history of Yale University. About one in four Yale students take it. On Wednesday she gave an abridged, one-hour version of her class to a packed, oversized conference room at Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom's New York office in Times Square. The class wasn't about finance, time management or crafting convincing arguments. It was about happiness.
This begs a couple of questions: Why are students at Yale so unhappy that 25% of them feel the need to take a course on being happy, and what does this have to do with the legal profession?
Turns out the same reasons that mental health issues, substance abuse and depression are so prevalent in the legal profession also affect students at elite academic institutions. The high-achieving, high-performing students at Yale are often taken in by a culture that socially rewards long hours, overdrive performance and financially motivated outcomes.
That environment is not different from the culture that persists in Big Law, which, according to the studies that Santos cites and the course that she teaches, fosters unhappiness. What's more, happy lawyers perform better than not happy lawyers.
Skadden, like most major firms, is hoping to enact programs that help their attorneys deal with mental health issues. Santos' talk was well attended by dozens of Skadden employees and well received by the audience, indicating that the attorneys and other firm personnel were also quite interested in engaging in a mental health discussion.
"As our industry grapples with how best to address substance use, depression and other serious mental health issues, [Santos] offers a salient perspective to the broader conversation around emotional well-being and health, and the connection between the two," said Jodie Garfinkel, director of talent development and strategy at Skadden.
Santos mentioned some interesting facts, such as the ability to be happy is roughly 50% genetic (so yes, some people are literally born happy). And that in order to be happy, you actually need to work at it (sounds counterintuitive, but OK). And that talking to strangers on the subway during the morning commute will make someone happier for most of the rest of the day (how can that be possible? But OK.) And daily gratitudes work (truth).
But this discussion might have also been a bit of a wake-up call for some. During the course of her talk, Santos cited various studies about behaviors that can lead to increased happiness and those that lead to increased unhappiness. Many of the behaviors that can be causal to decreased happiness also happen to be behaviors traditionally associated with the legal profession.
Some were obvious, some not so much. Getting enough sleep, eating right and taking care of oneself physically were ones that made sense. "After just one week of minimal sleep (less than five hours), you are more susceptible to disease, have lower cognitive function and are four times more likely to have a stroke than someone who gets adequate sleep," Santos said.
But things like not being financially (or as much so) motivated and taking time to relax (meditate, chat with a friend) might be a bit harder to swallow, especially in a profession that measures success by how much money it brings in and tracks that money through billable hours.
The good news is that many of the factors for happiness are within an individual's control. Santos said that it is great that law firms as a whole are starting to implement plans for wellness and offer things like midday meditations or more flexible hours for those who want to spend time with family. But she also said that, in order for people to utilize these resources, the mandate needs to come from the top to have it be culturally acceptable. And for at least an hour on a Wednesday at one of the most busy and successful law firms in the world, it was.
Read More Here:
Minds Over Matters: An Examination of Mental Health in the Legal Profession
Seeing Lawyers in Crisis, Some Blame the Billable Hour
The Legal Profession's Very Real Impact on Personal Relationships
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
The Right Amount?: Federal Judge Weighs $1.8M Attorney Fee Request with Strip Club's $15K Award
Avoiding the Great Gen AI Wrecking Ball: Ignore AI’s Transformative Power at Your Own Risk
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 2Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 3'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 4Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
- 5Kirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250