Franklin Pierce Stages a (Law School) Comeback—150 Years After His Death
The University of New Hampshire School of Law has rebranded, adding Franklin Pierce back into its name after ditching the moniker nine years ago. Alumni had long pushed for the change.
May 23, 2019 at 12:02 PM
3 minute read
|
Welcome back, Franklin Pierce. The moniker of our 14th president is returning to legal education after a nine-year absence. University of New Hampshire Law School dean Megan Carpenter announced Tuesday that the Concord campus will henceforth be known as the University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law after years of alumni requests. The new name will also capitalize on the school's reputation as an intellectual property powerhouse, according to Carpenter.
It's the latest twist for a law school that has seen significant change over the past decade. The campus was founded in 1973 as the independent Franklin Pierce Law School, and it established one of the most respected intellectual property programs in the country. (Pierce, a lawyer who died in 1869, was a New Hampshire native.) The University of New Hampshire acquired the state's only law school in 2010 and dropped the Franklin Pierce name altogether. At the time, the school's admissions dean said her office fielded many questions from prospective students about who Franklin Pierce is.
But alumni of the school felt differently, according to Carpenter, who unveiled the news to members of the law school community at the Intellectual Trademark Association's annual meeting in Boston this week.
“I want to tell you—honestly—the biggest question I'm asked from all of you is, 'Can we get Franklin Pierce back into the name of the school?' ” Carpenter said during her announcement of the change. “I've been asked that three times today alone. I'm here to tell you tonight that we have heard you. You, the University of New Hampshire, and us together, have decided that effective today, right now, our law school is the University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law.”
The announcement was met with a roar of approval from the assembled crowd.
Recent naming controversies at law schools have highlighted the sensitive nature of institutional monikers and the deep attachment alumni sometimes feel to them. The University of California, Berkeley School of Law last year opted to drop its informal “Boalt Hall” name after researchers revealed the racist past of namesake John Boalt. But the law school community was evenly split over ditching the name, dean Erwin Chemerinsky said at the time. Florida State University is currently trying to strip the name of former Florida Supreme Court Justice B.K. Roberts from its law school campus, but has run into legislative roadblocks. (Critics have taken issue with Robert's opposition to racial integration from the bench.)
Franklin Pierce—the former president—hasn't come under that type of scrutiny, though he opposed the abolitionist movement in the run-up to the Civil War. But alumni feel an affinity for the name and its connection to the school's history. And the Franklin Pierce association with intellectual property excellence is worth preserving, according to Carpenter.
“The Franklin Pierce name is considered the gold standard for intellectual property internationally,” she said in a statement on the change. “We're confident welcoming Franklin Pierce back into our name will build new bridges globally as well as enhance relationships with our alumni.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250