SEC Advisor Fraud Charge Shows Hazards of 'Dual-Hat' CCOs
The dual-hat CCO "usually does not have the time, expertise or interest to do the job properly," according to Cipperman Compliance Services.
May 29, 2019 at 01:09 PM
3 minute read
SECThe original version of this story was published on Law.com
A recent fraud charge levied by the Securities and Exchange Commission against an advisor shows that the dual hat senior executive/chief compliance officer role "doesn't work," opines Cipperman Compliance Services.
The SEC charged Stephen Brandon Anderson with defrauding clients by overcharging advisory fees of at least $367,000.
According to the SEC's order, Anderson owned and operated River Source Wealth Management, LLC, a now-defunct registered investment advisor in North Carolina. During the relevant time period, Anderson owned and operated River Source and served as its chief compliance officer.
River Source's primary revenue stream was customer advisory fees, with customer agreements stating those fees would be based on each customer's assets under management. The company was formally dissolved in February 2018.
In 2015 and 2016, however, Anderson overcharged a majority of his clients, with the amount and percentages varying, but in the aggregate, amounting to approximately 40% more than the agreed-upon maximum customer advisory fees, the SEC states.
In total, River Source received approximately $650,000 in advisory fees for 2015, of which at least $185,816 were overcharges, the order states. River Source received approximately $640,000 in advisory fees for 2016, of which at least $181,360 were overcharges.
Anderson also misled his clients about why he transferred their assets from River Source's long-time asset custodian, falsely stating that it was his decision and that the separation was "amicable." According to the SEC order, the asset custodian ended its relationship with River Source after it noticed irregular billing practices, requested documents to support certain charges, and failed to receive those documents from Anderson.
The order finds that Anderson made material misstatements in reports filed with the commission, including overstating River Source's assets under management by at least $34 million (18%) in 2015 and $61 million (35%) in 2016, and failed to implement required compliance policies and procedures.
He also failed to disclose two client lawsuits, the order states.
"When advisors breach their duty to clients by misleading and overcharging them, they can expect the SEC will craft a package of remedies that will compensate harmed investors, provide additional safeguards for prospective investors, and deter similar conduct," said Carolyn Welshhans, associate director in the SEC's Enforcement Division, in a statement.
Anderson agreed to a cease-and-desist order and a censure, and agreed to pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $405,381 and a $100,000 penalty. Payments will be distributed to harmed investors through a fair fund. Anderson consented to the order without admitting or denying the findings.
In commenting on the order, Cipperman Compliance Services states that "the dual hat CCO model (i.e. a senior executive also serving as the Chief Compliance Officer) doesn't work."
The dual-hat CCO "usually does not have the time, expertise or interest to do the job properly," Cipperman wrote. "Also, a CCO must have enough independence from the business to properly enforce the applicable regulatory and compliance obligations."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250