To Make Partner, Slow and Steady Does It
Unique skill sets and business development acumen take considerable time and effort to acquire, so if partnership is the objective, investing in them throughout the associate years is key.
May 29, 2019 at 12:06 PM
7 minute read
If I were to offer you $100 today or $120 a week from now, which would you choose? While thought experiments aren't the same as real-world experiments, if you're like most people you'd choose the hundred bucks now. That's the conclusion of a classic study, which found that, when it comes to decision-making, most of us opt for immediate gratification.
Why does this matter? Well, succeeding as an associate in a law firm is all about balancing short-term and long-term rewards and prioritizing time and attention in congruence with one's personal objectives.
For example, associates who have no intention or desire to make partner at a law firm would likely optimize for the billable hour, because the economic incentives in most law firms would provide them with greater financial rewards for doing so.
Associates who hope to make partner, however, would balance billable time with a greater emphasis on non-billable time. They would understand that the old apprenticeship, “keep your head down and do good work” law firm model has changed, and that associates who are elected into a partnership are those who have unique skill-sets and demonstrable business development acumen. These qualities—unique skill-sets and business development acumen—take considerable amounts of time and effort to acquire, so if partnership and its long-term rewards are the objective, the rational thing to do would be to invest in them throughout one's career as an associate.
Of course, no one is purely rational. We're all affected by cognitive biases that lead to suboptimal decision-making. While we all prefer big rewards over smaller ones, most of us have an even stronger preference for present rewards over future ones—even when the future ones are much bigger. This concept, or cognitive bias, is called “hyperbolic discounting.” In short, the farther away a reward is in the future, the smaller the immediate motivation to achieve it.
Instead of leveraging the immense power of compound interest, many people prioritize short-term spending over long-term investing. And, yes, many associates, who harbor hopes of partnership, prioritize the bonuses and salary bumps that come from high billable hours and never find time to invest in the non-billable work that's necessary to realize the longer-term rewards available at a law firm.
|The disconnect between goals and everyday action
Preference for short-term rewards over long-term ones is not the only reason law firm associates fail to invest sufficient time in continuing education and business development activities. They're also flooded with billable-hour work demands that cloud and overwhelm their ability to focus on important, but not necessarily urgent, long-term priorities.
Like waves crashing on shore, partner and client demands can crowd out all else. Despite good intentions, as expressed at the bottom of a to-do list, the urgency of the moment almost always takes precedence. Next thing you know, you're a seventh-year associate who's being told that you need a book of business to make partner, and you're scrambling furiously to catch up.
Except you can't. There's no time. You still have hefty billable hour requirements. And there's only 168 hours in a week. You needed to start earlier. Only in the rearview mirror can you see clearly how short-term thinking cost you the long-term opportunity you covet.
At the root of this problem is the fact that, while most associates start their careers with goals in mind, they never reduce those goals to everyday action. It's not nearly enough to want something in the future. You need to have a clear plan in place and, most importantly, act on it. A goal without action is merely a dream. Goals determine the direction you want to head in but action determines your progress.
To make goal-setting more effective, here are some principles to keep in mind:
Make it specific. To be useful, a goal must be specific. “I want to become a good lawyer” is too loose. “I want to make partner in eight years” is better.
Don't have too many. If you have one clear goal, your direction is defined. Your actions can all be directed toward achieving a single outcome. Have too many goals and you may find yourself going in circles (or never get started in the first place).
Understand its component parts. A big goal in the future is really a series of smaller, interim goals.
By keeping these principles in mind, it will allow you to achieve far more, over the long term, than you ever thought possible through a process called deconstructive goal setting. Deconstructive goal setting, like all goal-setting exercises, involves envisioning a big, ambitious objective. But it doesn't stop there. It forces you to work backward from your goal to determine and define all the steps necessary to get there.
Let's say you're a third-year associate and you want to make partner. You have approximately five years to achieve your goal. Through a process of deconstructive goal setting, you'd first take the time to understand what it takes to make partner at your firm. At most this involves becoming a highly competent lawyer who's capable of developing business that keeps herself and others at the firm busy. With this understanding in mind, it's all about deconstructing these objectives into specific action steps within the constraints of allotted time.
You have five years to work with. This means that, to be on track for your five-year goal, you will need to progress to a certain point in one year. To be where you need to be in one year, you'll have to take action this month. A month passes quickly, so you better have a plan in place this week. And if you're going to make progress this week, you probably need to be focused on your long-term priorities today.
See how this works? You're capable of achieving extraordinary results way out in the future. But actually doing so is contingent upon on taking everyday action. Don't procrastinate. Don't merely plan and hold loosely formed beliefs about what the future holds in your head. Put the work in now to make it happen. Here's how:
- Define your goal: Think clearly about what you want. Write it down. This will allow you to understand what it takes. Don't fixate on the result (e.g., making partner). Focus on the underlying skills, qualities and attributes that will allow you to achieve the result. There are lots of sacrifices and trade-offs that you'll have to make to achieve what you want, so it's important that you understand them from the start.
- Deconstruct your goal to everyday action: Work backwards to understand the component parts of your big goal and set a series of smaller goals that will keep you working on a linear path within the time you have available. You should deconstruct your big goal to the point where you have a clear understanding of the appropriate action you should be taking today to be on the right path.
- Block Time: You're going to have all kinds of externalities, from urgent work demands to personal issues, attempting to derail you from making progress on your goals. Your calendar, which is likely filled with other people's priorities, will be one of your biggest impediments to progress. But it can be your best friend. If you have the courage and discipline to schedule time with yourself, even if it's just 15 or 30 minutes per day, you'll create the space and time necessary to stay on track. Block time to work on your goals every day—otherwise you'll never get where you want to go.
Jay Harrington is an executive coach and trainer for lawyers and law firms and is the author of the new book, “The Essential Associate: Step Up, Stand Out, and Rise to the Top as a Young Lawyer.” He is the owner of Harrington Communications and is associated with Simier Partners. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllProtecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
6 minute readThe Path in the Multiverse: Rethinking Client Engagement Through Gamification
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
- 2Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect
- 3Simpson Thacher Launches in Luxembourg With Hires From A&O Shearman, Clifford Chance
- 4How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 5Big Firms May See 'Uncomfortable Flashbacks' as Cost Pressure Grows
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250