Judge Doesn't Shoot Down Journalist's 'Narcos' Lawsuit
Colombian media personality Virginia Vallejo's copyright infringement suit against the Netflix show "Narcos" is going forward—and it's all thanks to a love scene with a gun.
May 30, 2019 at 05:48 PM
3 minute read
Colombian media personality Virginia Vallejo's copyright infringement suit against the Netflix show “Narcos” is going forward—and it's all thanks to a love scene with a gun.
Vallejo sued Netflix and its “Narcos” producing partners in August 2018, claiming the show misappropriated several scenes from her 2007 memoir, “Loving Pablo, Hating Escobar.” In one instance, the episode called “The Palace in Flames” reenacts the raid on Colombia's Palace of Justice by the guerrilla group M-19.
Vallejo says the scene in that episode detailing a meeting between Escobar and the head of M-19 comes from her book. There is another scene in the series where Escobar introduces Valeria Velez, noted in the suit as “the character allegedly based on Plaintiff,” to his wife at a political event. Vallejo also says that scene can be found in her book. Lastly, an “intimate encounter” between Escobar and Velez involving a revolver only became public knowledge after the publication of her book, the suit claims.
Vallejo's attorney, Robert Thornburg of Allen, Dyer, Doppelt + Gilchrist, said his client is unhappy with the way she is portrayed in the series. ”You would think that if you really wanted to tell the true story and broadcast it as based upon true events, you would suggest that they consult with the people available,” he told Miami New Times. “She was available, but they didn't. What they did was take her book and take a free pass. And they think they can keep the free pass.”
Netflix and its partners filed a motion to dismiss in the fall of 2018. Ruling on that motion, U.S. District Court Judge K. Michael Moore of the Southern District of Florida rejected most of Vallejo's claims—except for the “intimate encounter.”
“While Plaintiff does not provide the specific details of the scene in Narcos that allegedly infringed on the Memoir, Plaintiff does allege that this scene involves a unique expression—namely, an intimate encounter that involves a revolver. While copyright protection does not extend to ideas it is plausible that Defendants infringed on Plaintiff's expression with respect to this scene,” wrote Moore.
Louis P. Petrich of Leopold, Petrich & Smith in Los Angeles, who represents the defendants, had no comment on the decision. Neither Scott D. Ponce nor Rebecca J. Cañamero of Holland & Knight in Miami, who also represent the defendants, responded to a request for comment before deadline.
The U.S. government flew Vallejo out of Colombia in 2006 so she could safely testify in several high-profile cases involving figures connected to the cocaine cartels. She presently works for Russian Today Spanish.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
5 minute readFederal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
As Uncertainty Hovers Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
'Possible Harm'?: Winston & Strawn Will Appeal Unfavorable Ruling in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250