Frustrated With Big Law Diversity, Many Companies Are Looking Elsewhere
Clients are looking for outside counsel with a diverse talent pool, and Big Law isn't delivering. Many companies are turning to minority- and women-owned law firms that can provide quality service and meet their diversity requirements.
June 03, 2019 at 03:40 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The glacial pace of progress made by Big Law in achieving diversity has pushed clients looking to fulfill lofty diversity goals elsewhere: They are hiring minority-and women-owned law firms.
Clients, especially Fortune 500 companies, are committing millions more in legal spend to diverse firms, partnering with organizations such as the National Association of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms (NAMWOLF). Clients say they find little-to-no drop in the quality of service they get from these firms because many are founded by minority and women attorneys who left prestigious law firms to start their own.
“We are committed to minority- and women-owned law firms and the work that they do,” said Lisa Wolmart, vice president and corporate counsel at The Prudential Insurance Co. of America, which regularly uses minority and women-owned firms as outside counsel. “They provide excellent legal services, quality of work and legal expertise.”
The 2019 Diversity Scorecard revealed that big law firms still have a long way to go on diversity. Minorities make up only 16.9% of Am Law 200 attorney head count. More specifically, black attorneys make up only 3.3% of lawyers in Big Law. Women continue to be underrepresented in leadership roles.
Fortune 500 companies have long had programs promoting diversity within their ranks. In recent years, those diversity and inclusion goals have seeped into their legal spend, culminating in January with an open letter signed by more than 200 general counsel demanding more diverse legal representation.
But frustrated by Big Law's glacial progress, many companies are looking to minority and women-owned law firms to fill the need for a more diverse legal team. Last month, Turo chief legal officer Michelle Fang, who spearheaded the GC letter, followed up with the release of a list of actionable steps that general counsel looking to promote diverse legal talent should take. Hiring minority- and women-owned law firms was high on the list.
At some large corporations, steps are already being taken. Of the 15 law firms that receive Prudential's top legal spend, three are minority- or women-owned, Wolmart said. And the insurance company's official corporate policy states that when seeking outside counsel, the legal department must consider hiring a diverse law firm for any legal matter.
Prudential is also one of the founding members of the NAMWOLF's Inclusion Initiative, a program that encourages corporations to increase legal spend on minority- and women-owned law firms. Thirty-three companies are members, including UPS, Walmart, Verizon and Morgan Stanley. In 2010, the first year of the program, the 11 founding members spent $42 million for services provided by minority and women-owned law firms. In 2017, that figure rose to $240 million. In the seven years of the program's existence, members have spent a total of $1.4 billion for services provided by diverse firms.
“Corporate law departments really have in our view an important role to play in pushing diversity, and I think we have a lot of power to do that,” said Wolmart. ”There's obviously a lot of room for improvement within the profession generally. [Big law] firms have a lot of work to do.”
Many diverse firms are founded by women and minority attorneys disenchanted with the often unfriendly environment of big law. While many firms achieve parity in gender and diversity within their associate ranks, women and minorities find themselves leaving before making partner.
“When they start their own law firms they have the same credentials as Big Law,” said Joel Stern, CEO of NAMWOLF. “Our value proposition to clients comes in this order: quality, value, supporting diversity and inclusion.”
In the last five years, NAMWOLF membership has swelled from 123 firms to nearly 200. Annual meetings attract 900 attendees.
John Murdock, name partner at Virginia-based Potter & Murdock, a law firm owned by minorities and women, said his practice has grown significantly in the six years since he joined NAMWOLF. Murdock joined his firm in 2008 from then-400-attorney firm Epstein Becker & Green.
The appeal of NAMWOLF firms, he said, is that they do not subscribe to what he sees as a fundamental problem with Big Law: The established top law firms operate under the assumption that if you go to certain top law schools, you'll get the best talent and over a nine-year period, the most talented of that group will make partner.
“The reality is that the model may have some benefits, but it does not validly retain, identify and promote the best talent,” Murdock said. “It's simply a model.”
|Similar Stories:
Diversity Scorecard: African American Lawyers Are Being Left Out
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Companies' Dirty Little Secret: Those Privacy Opt-Out Requests Usually Aren't Honored
Ballooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250