Six-Lawyer Bankruptcy Group of Firm Facing Cash 'Crunch' Heads to Montgomery McCracken
The departures of a core group for CKR's business could help Philadelphia-based Montgomery McCracken bounce back after losing more than 20 lawyers to Armstrong Teasdale last year.
June 04, 2019 at 02:49 PM
4 minute read
Six lawyers from the bankruptcy practice of beleaguered firm CKR Law have moved to the New York and Delaware offices of Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads, ALM has learned.
Edward Schnitzer, who heads CKR's bankruptcy practice, joined the Philadelphia-based law firm, where he will chair its bankruptcy and financial restructuring practice. Four others are joining him as partners and one as of counsel. The lawyers, who started at Montgomery McCracken on Tuesday, represent creditors, trustees and other parties in bankruptcy courts and related proceedings.
Schnitzer, David Banker, Maura Russell and Gilbert “Gib” Saydah joined the firm as partners in New York. Marc Phillips and Jeffrey Carbino joined the firm's Wilmington office, where Phillips is partner and Carbino is of counsel.
“While we each have our own specialties that we focus more time on, collectively, we handle all sorts of bankruptcy matters and all sorts of constituents in a bankruptcy,” Schnitzer said.
The bankruptcy group has worked a variety of important and high-profile cases. They currently represent creditors in the bankruptcies of Sears Holding Corp. and Westinghouse; creditors' committees in three other cases; and a client in the Heritage Home Group Chapter 11. They collectively have more than 100 years of legal experience.
Schnitzer and his colleagues were tight-lipped about the circumstances of their departure from CKR, a firm whose leaders acknowledged in internal emails this year that it is facing a “cash flow crunch.” Some partners had not been paid their regular draws in at least three months, ALM reported in May.
The incoming Montgomery McCracken lawyers would not say whether they had been paid, whether they were owed money, or even when their last day at the firm was.
“The best I can tell you is we were presented with an opportunity to join a great firm,” Schnitzer said. “We left CKR on good terms. We wish everyone there the best, the firm the best.”
Former CKR colleagues who spoke on the condition of anonymity said the bankruptcy group left Monday. They said it had been a “core” part of the firm's business.
CKR's managing partner Jeffrey Rinde said in a statement Tuesday that he wished the departing lawyers well and said the firm still has bankruptcy lawyers in Washington, Delaware, California and Texas.
Rinde added that the firm's cash flow situation had improved. “The firm has made recent draws to performing partners and made commitments to those partners with respect to the past-due draws,” he wrote. “In addition, CKR is in the process of replacing underperforming partners with partners with established books of business or who can service existing client demands.”
Meanwhile, 96-lawyer Montgomery McCracken has seen its own share of lateral movement in and out of the firm over the past year. It counted over 120 lawyers as recently as last August, when it launched an intellectual property department with the hiring of four lawyers from Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney.
But in September, its executive chairman Richard Scheff and six other lawyers departed to help Armstrong Teasdale launch a Philadelphia office. And in January, Armstrong Teasdale hired another 16 lawyers from Montgomery McCracken to launch an office in New York.
In an interview, Richard “Rick” Simins, Montgomery McCracken's vice chairman, said the addition of the CKR team was “very much of a piece with our strategic plan to grow our New York office.” He said the firm was anticipating last year's departures and is “actively in discussions with people in Wilmington, Philadelphia and New York” to join the firm.
“We're actively looking to attract lawyers of any practice or specialty to our New York office, so long as they're all high-quality lawyers and share the same sort of cultural expectation in terms of collaborativeness that we value so much at Montgomery McCracken,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Companies' Dirty Little Secret: Those Privacy Opt-Out Requests Usually Aren't Honored
Ballooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250