With New Chatbot Track for Summer Associates, Wilson Sonsini Puts AI to the Test
As part of a new program, a group of summer associates at Wilson Sonsini is partnering with the firm's senior attorneys and technical staff to create automated chatbots for clients to use.
June 05, 2019 at 02:47 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Writing is typically an important part of the summer associate experience at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. This year, that includes writing code for a chatbot.
As part of a new program, a group of summer associates at Wilson Sonsini is partnering with the firm's senior attorneys and technical staff to create automated chatbots for clients to use.
Wilson Sonsini corporate strategic innovation counsel David Yi Wang, who is in charge of the “build a bot” program, said the next generation of incoming lawyers will need to know how to use technology to build tools and contribute to the firm's existing portfolio of tools in order to add value to the firm's practice.
“Given our firm history and culture, we have always considered ourselves to be one of the innovators and disruptors in the industry,” said Wang. “That's how Wilson Sonsini become Wilson Sonsini. To keep that tradition alive, we want to become a leader in legal technology and applying legal technology in practice.”
According to Wang, this is the first time the firm is allowing its summer associates to build chatbots, instead of completing the standard writing requirement, to be eligible for a job offer. He said the initiative also allows the firm to test whether a small group of lawyers is able to develop an automated solution in a short period of time.
“If three summer associates and one lawyer over the course of six weeks can build a bot themselves … that means that there is a far broader potential for decentralized automation than people previously recognized,” Wang said.
“If summer associates can do it, that means there is really very little substantive knowledge required. They are not even lawyers yet,” he added.
Altogether, five different teams are building five different chatbots. Each team consists of three summer associates and one attorney adviser. These teams are collaborating working with Australian-based legaltech startup Josef Legal Pty Ltd to develop the chatbots.
For example, one of the teams is making a bot that can automate the intake process for CFIUS review matters. Instead of putting a team of attorneys on every part of the transaction, the bot will handle the initial information collection and analysis, Wang explained.
This year, Wilson Sonsini accepted about 90 summer associates, according to Wang. Associates who elect the chatbot project for their apprenticeship will have to present the result to the hiring committee and practice technology committee, of which Wang is a member.
“They would fail if they don't do the project,” said Wang. “I don't think there is a precedent for anybody failing, so certainly I am not intending to fail anybody.”
Wang, who joined Wilson Sonsini from Davis Polk & Wardwell in 2014, was elected to serve as the firm's first corporate strategic innovation counsel last May when Wilson Sonsini formed a new technology community to increase collaboration between its legal practitioners. Wang said the group has grown to 30 attorneys and staff.
In other recent tech initiatives, the firm's subsidiary SixFifty recently launched a privacy app that helps companies comply with California's new privacy law.
“With all of our automation here at Wilson Sonsini, our goal is not to replace the lawyer, but to enable the lawyers to do more with their time, by replacing the element of their practice that is inefficient and routine,” said Wang.
|Read More
Partner Who Launched Goodwin's Hong Kong Office Returns to Wilson Sonsini in Calif.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Environmental Fines: Texas Secures Over $100M From Petrochemical Processor TPC Group
3 minute readBaker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250