Big Relief, Ex-Google Bro, Conversion in Court: The Morning Minute
Here's the news you need to start your day.
June 07, 2019 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
WHEW – Both plaintiffs and defense lawyers are likely heaving a sigh of relief after the Ninth Ciruit's en banc reversal of a decision that would have made it nearly impossible to get approval of nationwide class-action settlements. Amanda Bronstad reports that the panel's split decision on Thursday upended a 2018 opinion that had de-certified a nationwide settlement involving Hyundai and Kia over fuel efficiency estimates after concluding the district judge had failed to analyze the consumer laws of several states. The panel found that in general there was no requirement for such an analysis at the settlement stage.
CLASS ACT – The Google case involving a former male engineer who filed a class action against the tech giant last year for allegedly discriminating against him and other conservative white males is set for a hearing today. Alaina Lancaster reports that a California judge in Santa Clara is scheduled to hear Google's arguments that the facts don't support a bid for class-action status. Google fired engineer James Damore in 2017 after he distributed a 10-page memo that said the company's gender gap was based on biological differences, such as women's disposition toward “agreeableness” and “neuroticism.” Damore last year withdrew from the lawsuit to pursue claims in arbitration.
PERMANENCE – Lawyers from Cleary Gottlieb, the Southern Poverty Law Center and Lite DePalma are in New Jersey Superior Court today to argue for a permanent injunction against a so-called gay conversion therapy provider, JONAH.
TECH'S TROUBLES – It's been a year of fines, complaints and calls to investigate Apple, Amazon, Google and Facebook at home and abroad on the antitrust front, escalating this week with the House Judiciary Committee's probe into major U.S. tech companies' competitive practices and market share. Caroline Spiezio provides a look at a year of tech's antitrust legal tangles.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|Am Law Firms with Zero Black Partners—How Is This Possible in 2019?
You Can Now Take a Virtual Reality Tour of Akin Gump Offices
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
|TECHIES – Asia's first legal technology-focused startup accelerator has launched in Singapore—the latest step by the city-state to make its mark as a regional hub, John Kang reports. The Global Legal Innovation and Digital Entrepreneurship, or GLIDE, is part of a two-year pilot program started last year by a Singapore government body that promotes the city-state's legal industry. The accelerator is open for tech startups around the world in the legal, compliance and regulation fields.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
|“Discretion requires consistency.”
— ANTHONY KENNEDY, RETIRED JUSTICE OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, WHO DELIVERED THE OATH OF OFFICE DURING THE INVESTITURE THIS WEEK OF U.S. ATTORNEY DAVID ANDERSON OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. IN HIS REMARKS, KENNEDY SAID THAT ANDERSON WOULD REGULARLY HAVE TO EXERCISE “VAST DISCRETION” IN HIS NEW POSITION.➤➤ Sign up here to receive the Morning Minute straight to your inbox.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Template' for Religious Accommodation: Attorney Gives Insight to $12M Win Over Employer's COVID-19 Vaccination Policies
Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute read5th Circuit Judge Jones Slams Proposal for Greater Amicus Brief Funding Disclosure
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
- 2Steve Bannon 'We Build The Wall' Fraud Trial Pushed to February 2025
- 3'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
- 4Questions About Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act Remain Unanswered
- 5Santa Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250