How I Made Partner: Latham & Watkins' Laura Washington
"You have to add value to a litigation or a deal in a unique way—whether by knowing an area of the law or the facts of a case better than anyone else, or having great rapport with clients."
June 10, 2019 at 04:04 PM
5 minute read
Practice area: Complex commercial litigation and entertainment sports and media litigation.
Law school and year of graduation: Georgetown University Law Center, 2009.
How long have you been at the firm? Since June 2015.
How long were you an associate at the firm? Two years.
Were you an associate at another firm before joining your present firm? Yes, I started my career as an associate at O'Melveny & Myers in December 2009. I left in June 2015 and came to Latham & Watkins.
What year did you make partner at your current firm? January 2018.
What's the biggest surprise you experienced in becoming partner? When I made partner, I received so many congratulations and heartfelt notes from staff, associates and my fellow partners throughout the firm. What struck me the most was the number of notes I received from female associates of color, some of whom I had never met, expressing how I had inspired them by making partner. When I was grinding to make partner, I could get so absorbed in the details of a specific matter or litigation that I could lose the perspective that associates look to their seniors—particularly partners—as a guide or model for their own careers. To realize I had become a model for others was truly humbling and surprising and incredibly meaningful.
What do you think was the deciding point for the firm in making you partner? Latham takes a holistic approach when selecting partners and considers many factors. I believe Latham considered my performance on individual matters, my ability to work with other partners and to supervise junior associates, my work on firm committees, my commitment to the firm's diversity efforts, and the strength of my practice and potential for growth.
Describe how you feel now about your career now that you've made partner. Pretty good. Making partner was a goal I was striving for since I was a junior associate, and when it happened it was an amazing feeling. But I see partnership as one step in a long career, one that allows me to have more control in shaping my career.
What's the key to successful business development in your opinion? Saying yes. We work long, hard hours. So when clients, potential clients, friends, work colleagues or acquaintances ask us to attend events at the end of a long day, it can be tempting to make excuses and say no. But saying yes and attending events is the key to successful business development—which is all about relationships. By going, not only are you maintaining and improving your relationships with current clients and colleagues, but you are generating opportunities to form relationships with individuals that may ultimately lead to new business.
What's been the biggest change, day-to-day, in your routine since becoming partner? The amount of emails and calls I get in a single day has significantly increased, especially after 9 a.m. In order to manage, I get into the office much earlier, well before 9 a.m. I find that I can be the most productive early in the day when it is quieter.
Who had the greatest influence in your career that helped propel you to partner? Marvin Putnam, a trial and litigation partner in the entertainment, sports and media practice. Marvin was previously a partner at O'Melveny & Myers when I started my career there. From my first year as an associate until now, Marvin has always supported my career and been my mentor and sponsor. When I was a junior associate, he had confidence in me and gave me opportunities that junior associates typically do not receive, like first chairing depositions, preparing CEOs for trial testimony, and participating in jury voir dire. His confidence has never wavered and continues now that I am his partner. The opportunities Marvin presented me as a junior associate were instrumental to my development into the lawyer I am today.
What's the best piece of advice you could give an associate who wants to make partner? Obviously, doing excellent work is a prerequisite for making partner. But all of the associates who are considered for partner do excellent work, so partnership requires more than that. You have to add value to a litigation or a deal in a unique way—whether by knowing an area of the law or the facts of a case better than anyone else or having a great rapport with clients. Your value proposition could be anything. Once you identify how you can add value in a unique way, use that skill to distinguish yourself from other associates. And make sure you have a mentor. Without a mentor—someone guiding your path to partnership, that path is nearly impossible to navigate. We all stand on someone else's shoulders. Make sure you have shoulders to stand on.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Strive to Be a Servant Leader,' Says Steve Osborn of Mintz
How I Made Partner: 'Get Involved in as Many Transactions as Possible,' Says Tristan Dollie of Brown Rudnick
TikTok Antitrust Counsel Amaryllis Müller on Navigating EU Rules, Admiring Vestager and Bodybuilding
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250