UCLA Latest School Hit by Doctor's Sex Scandal
UCLA is the latest example of campus doctors being accused of sex crimes, and the consequences have included internal investigations, lawsuits and multimillion-dollar legal fees at other schools.
June 11, 2019 at 05:21 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Yet another university legal department is caught up in dealing with a sexual abuse scandal, as a former staff gynecologist at the University of California, Los Angeles for 27 years has been charged with sexual battery and exploitation involving two patients.
UCLA is the latest example of campus doctors being accused of sex crimes, and the consequences have included internal investigations, lawsuits and multimillion-dollar legal fees at other schools. The scandals have also cost some general counsel their jobs.
Neither University of California systemwide general counsel Charles Robinson nor managing campus counsel Amy Blum returned messages seeking comment about the latest incident.
UCLA chancellor Gene Block and vice chancellor John Mazziotta issued a statement Monday saying Dr. James Heaps was charged and surrendered to law enforcement. He was released on $70,000 bond.
Neither Heaps nor his Los Angeles attorney, Tracy Green of Green & Associates, could be reached for comment Tuesday.
The UCLA statement said, “Dr. Heaps was an obstetrician-gynecologist who worked on a part-time basis at the UCLA student health center from approximately 1983 to 2010, was hired by UCLA Health in 2014 and held medical staff privileges at the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center from 1988 to 2018.”
It said the school first received a complaint against Heaps in 2017, and the university investigated it. When other complaints came in, the statement said Heaps was placed on leave in June 2018 and was told he would not be reappointed. Heaps was allowed to retire. UCLA said it reported the complaints to the Medical Board of California and law enforcement, but made no public announcement at the time.
The statement said in March the school initiated an independent review of its response to sexual misconduct in clinical settings. “The review is examining UCLA's response to such conduct and whether our policies and procedures to prevent, identify and address sexual misconduct are consistent with best practices,” the school said.
The university created a website that is soliciting information from “any patients with concerns about the care they received from Dr. Heaps,” and is offering resources to patients who need them.
Three other universities that have undergone upheaval over doctors' alleged sexual abuse are:
• University of Southern California: Also marred by the college admissions scandal, the school ousted its top legal officer, Carol Mauch Amir, in April after hundreds of police complaints were lodged against former gynecologist George Tyndall for sexual misconduct. Over 300 women have filed suits over their treatment in both state and federal courts in California.
On June 13 a federal judge gave preliminary approval to the USC settlement with Tyndall's victims. The deal creates a $215 million settlement fund. Tyndall has not been criminally charged and has denied the allegations.
• Ohio State University: Former sports doctor Richard Strauss, who practiced nearly two decades at the school, is accused of sexually abusing 177 male student athletes. The school released a report on Its internal investigation in May. The U.S. Department of Education has opened an investigation into how the school handled student complaints and whether it complied with federal law. In addition, three groups of plaintiffs have sued the university in federal court. Strauss committed suicide in 2005.
• Michigan State University: Two general counsel and one acting general counsel lost their jobs at Michigan during the Larry Nassar sex abuse scandal and its emotional aftermath. The school is still searching for a new one. Nassar, a sports doctor, was convicted to a lifetime in prison, and the school reached a $500 million settlement with 332 of his victims last year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250