'This Is Not Greenberg Traurig': Firm Leader Touts New Innovation Venture
Chairman Richard Rosenbaum says a new subsidiary, Recurve, will craft innovation solutions for clients and other law firms, while Greenberg Traurig sticks with its real expertise: the law.
June 12, 2019 at 05:25 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Greenberg Traurig chair Richard Rosenbaum recognizes that the traditional full-service law firm can't do everything.
For clients' primary needs—excellence in core legal areas—they're not looking anywhere else. But when it comes to so-called “commoditized” work, they have an increasing set of options, and law firms will invariably struggle to keep up with the technology needed to compete.
His firm announced this week it was founding a subsidiary, Recurve, that will partner with artificial intelligence providers, staffing firms, real estate innovators and other startups to guide clients as well as other law firms in taking advantage of the growing range of services available. The idea is to be “innovation architects,” who identify client needs and guide them toward solutions, but won't execute them or engage in the practice of law.
The initiative will be run out of Warsaw, Poland; Tel Aviv, Israel; and Denver, and will also include operations in strategically selected locations like Austin, Texas; Berlin; and South Florida. The 2,000-attorney firm has existing offices in all of these locations.
Rosenbaum spoke Wednesday with The American Lawyer about his vision for Recurve and what is novel about the offering.
In your own words, what is Recurve?
Over time we obviously have seen the evolution of both technology and other forms of staffing, artificial intelligence and other value-enhancing ways of addressing so-called repetitive and commoditized aspects of legal work. Because of that, there has arisen a lot of capital spending and business units within law firms, with limited success for the most part. It's very hard to keep up with the cutting edge.
I strongly believe that clients would prefer to entrust their trusted legal advisers as their primary legal counsel.
I don't believe that the traditional law firm, particularly within the U.S., can access the kind of capital that public companies, private-equity funded companies and large accounting firms can easily access to buy technology. So how do you reconcile that?
The idea here is with Recurve, you have a team of innovation experts, people who are familiar with the traditional law firm model, as well as with what's available in the innovation marketplace, to work with the clients. The clients can be actual consumers of legal work, or law firms.
This is not Greenberg Traurig. It's intended to be a collaborative platform that has owners that could include other law firms.
A simple way of saying it is, it's almost like one of those car sharing or space sharing platforms. It's an environment for innovation which will help clients and law firms and providers come together in one place.
What is the initial investment from the firm?
The initial investment from us is really not very large. It's just a team of experts, many of whom already work in the firm.
The initial locations are Warsaw, Tel Aviv and Denver. The supplementary locations are Austin, Texas, Miami and Berlin. So when you look at these locations, you're basically in centers of innovation where we already are. If you look at Tel Aviv, it's already one of the centers of legal tech innovation. If you look at Warsaw it's becoming a place for innovation and tech at low costs, for banks, law firms, et cetera.
When it gets into the initial implementation, think of the architect: you're going to be designing solutions, others are going to be implementing them.
What are the types of strategic partners you are looking to bring on board?
Several staffing companies, technology companies that are involved in this space, including the sort of companies that are involved in the communications collaboration space. Clients want to have a space where they can collaborate 24/7 with their law firms and their in-house counsel. There are several major players in that group, one of whom is going to be among the initial group.
There's a real estate-oriented group that's very involved in the creation of nimble space: It's not long-term leases, it's flexible leased space. There's an artificial intelligence component.
Some of the early players are names that you have heard of, that will do some of the funding. There are companies that you don't know, but are very anxious to get involved in this kind of effort.
You're going to be marketing this to existing clients, you're going to be marketing to other law firms. Who else is the target audience?
Recurve is going to be marketing this to our existing clients, to other firms' existing clients, and to other firms. It will have its own independent focus in terms of a client base, but of course Greenberg Traurig and Greenberg Traurig's existing clients will be the beneficiaries.
When can we expect to find out a little more?
Within 30 to 60 days we're going to do a release that gives a lot more detail, particularly as to the strategic partners. That's the most important detail we haven't given out yet.
|Read More
These Law Firms Are Investing in Legal Operations. It's Paying Off
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250