READ: DOJ Memo Defends Trump's Refusal to Release Tax Returns
Steven Engel, head of DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel, said Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin "quite reasonably, concluded that Chairman [Richard] Neal had not articulated the real reason for his request."
June 14, 2019 at 05:50 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The U.S. Treasury Department is acting lawfully in refusing to provide President Donald Trump's tax returns to House Democrats despite a federal law that says the government “shall furnish” any requested information about a private citizen, the Justice Department said in a new legal memo published Friday.
Federal law has long permitted the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee to inspect the tax returns of private individuals, and the law does not require congressional lawmakers to state a reason for wanting to review a citizen's tax records. But the Justice Department is arguing that Democrats have offered “pretextual” reasons for wanting to see Trump's records and that the Treasury secretary was not out of bounds to “close his eyes and blindly accept a pretextual justification for that request.”
“Congress could not constitutionally confer upon the committee the right to compel disclosure by the executive branch of confidential information that did not serve a legitimate legislative purpose,” the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel memo stated. “While the executive branch should accord due deference and respect to congressional requests, Treasury was not obliged to accept the committee's stated purpose without question, and based on all the facts and circumstances.”
Representatives from the House Ways and Means Committee did not immediately comment Friday about the DOJ legal memo.
The Treasury Department's refusal to provide Trump's tax returns marks the latest clash between the administration and House Democrats and could spur a new legal fight in Washington's federal trial court. Trump's lawyers already are fighting in two federal appeals courts now to block House committees from obtaining financial records from his accounting firm and two banks. Judges in Washington and New York have upheld subpoenas issued to financial institutions in Trump's orbit.
House Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal, D-Massachusetts, first requested Trump's tax returns in April from Charles Rettig, the Internal Revenue Service commissioner.
“Consistent with its authority, the committee is considering legislative proposals and conducting oversight related to our federal tax laws, including, but not limited to, the extent to which the IRS audits and enforces federal tax laws against a president,” Neal wrote.
The Justice Department's memo, written by Steven Engel, the Senate-confirmed head of the Office of Legal Counsel, declared: “No one could reasonably believe that the committee seeks six years of President Trump's tax returns because of a newly discovered interest in legislating on the presidential-audit process.”
Engel said Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin “quite reasonably, concluded that Chairman Neal had not articulated the real reason for his request. The chairman's request that Treasury turn over the president's tax returns, for the apparent purpose of making them public, amounted to an unprecedented use of the committee's authority and raised a serious risk of abuse.”
The Justice Department's new legal memo memorializes advice given to the U.S. Treasury Department, which had resisted, for weeks, disclosing the requested tax records of Trump and related business entities.
Mnuchin last month said in a letter to Congress that the Justice Department was preparing a legal memo on the dispute.
“In reliance on the advice of the Department of Justice, I have determined that the committee's request lacks a legitimate legislative purpose, and pursuant to section 6103, the department is therefore not authorized to disclose the requested returns and return information,” Mnuchin wrote in his letter on May 6.
Mnuchin said in his letter that the Ways and Means committee's request “is unprecedented, and it presents serious constitutional questions, the resolution of which may have lasting consequences for all taxpayers.”
Trump had vowed for months on the campaign trail that he wanted to release his tax returns but was facing an IRS audit. Tax professional said then that any pending audit would not have precluded Trump from releasing his returns, as presidential candidates have done for decades.
“I'm always audited by the IRS—which I think is very unfair,” Trump said after one Republican presidential debate. “I don't maybe because of religion or something else.” He added: I'm a strong Christian and I feel strongly about it—and maybe there's a bias. You have many religious groups that are complaining about that.”
The new OLC memo is posted below:
Read more:
Trump's 'Character and Fitness' Is Questioned in Hotel Liquor-License Case
Trump's Lawyers Drag Justices Into DC Circuit Subpoena Fight
2 Amicus Briefs Played Big Roles in Latest 'Emoluments' Ruling Against Trump
Trump's Morgan Lewis Tax Lawyer Faces House Scrutiny
DC Circuit Won't Force IRS to Release Trump's Tax Returns
Charles Rettig, Trump's Pick for IRS Chief, Discloses Clients, Law Firm Salary
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readAttorney Sanctioned $9K for Revealing Nude Photos, Other Info in Court Filing
4 minute readChicago Cubs' IP Claim to Continue Against Wrigley View Rooftop, Judge Rules
2 minute readAfter Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
- 2In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 3A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
- 4Clifford Chance Adds Skadden Rainmaker in London
- 5Latham, Kirkland and Paul Weiss Climb UK M&A Rankings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250