Thompson & Knight Partner Saw Bullets Hit the Building as Shooter Attacked Texas Courthouse
"It was just like 10, 15 or 20 shots, something like that, just in rapid succession," said paralegal Julianna Gravois. "Bam, bam, bam, bam, bam."
June 18, 2019 at 06:30 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
The four-block walk from the train station to her downtown Dallas law office on Tuesday was surreal for paralegal Julianna Gravois.
“I knew the same time I was walking yesterday, the guy was at the courthouse,” she said, referring to Monday's shooting at the Earle Cabell Federal Building, which houses the U.S. District Court and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Texas.
Gravois first mistook the loud sound outside for a jackhammer, which struck her as odd. When the popping noise came again she went to a window, and saw the shooter, wearing tactical gear and a ski mask, begin shooting into the glass door.
“I watched the whole thing,” she recalled. “It was just like 10, 15 or 20 shots, something like that, just in rapid succession. … Bam, bam, bam, bam, bam.”
While Gravois had a bird's-eye view of the shooting from her firm's office in a building on Jackson Street catercorner to the federal building, Thompson & Knight partner Rich Phillips had a much more terrifying perspective.
Phillips was headed to court for a 9:30 a.m. trial in one of his cases, and around 8:40 a.m. when the shooting started, he was in his car and waiting to get into the parking lot where federal agents eventually shot down the suspect.
When he realized he was hearing gunshots, he scanned the area and saw the shooter running down Jackson Street, before opening fire.
“I saw bullets hit the side of the building. I could see puffs of smoke from the stonework,” Phillips said. “Then he got to the door and started firing into the glass.”
|'I Was Breathing Hard'
None of it seemed real as Phillips ducked behind his dashboard. When he peeked back up moments later, the view was terrifying.
“He had turned from the door of the courthouse and crossed the street and was coming in the parking lot and was basically coming right towards me,” he explained. “For a second, I didn't know what to do. He didn't take but a few steps into the parking lot when he hit the pavement and dropped down. He kind of hit the ground and then rolled. I didn't know if he had been shot and that's why he hit the ground, or that he was trying to avoid getting shot and was going to crawl around and use the cars as a shield.”
Phillips' fight or flight response then kicked in.
“I put the car in reverse and backed out of the driveway and took off down Wood Street. I remember feeling it took forever to get the car into gear, although I'm sure it was half a second or so. I was breathing hard and still trying to figure out what just happened,” he said.
Yet then, Phillips decided to turn around so that he could tell police what he had seen. They ushered him to safe locations several times, as law enforcement set up a command center. Eventually, police took his statement and he left the scene about 10 a.m. Because his car was inside police barricades, he walked across downtown to Thompson & Knight's office.
From paralegal Gravois' perspective looking out her firm's window, she saw something that Phillips did not: the moment when a group of heavily armed officers, walking behind rally shields, descended on the shooter and took him down. One plain-clothes officer even flew out of a car and went straight into the fray, she said.
“I was so impressed. It was crazy,” she said.
Later, Gravois and her colleagues heard a voice over their building's intercom telling them to retreat to the far side of their building, because police suspected a bomb could be in the shooter's vehicle. Later, she and the rest of the building's occupants were evacuated out of the entire building and set up a temporary office in a nearby hotel, she said.
“I was super, super shocked the whole time,” Gravois. said. “It's one of those things you feel you are watching it in a movie.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250