Lawsuit Against Church of Scientology Alleges Human Trafficking, Intimidation
The action claims the church engaged in human trafficking, child abuse, forced labor, exploitative commercial practices and intimidation campaigns aimed at anyone who spoke out against the church or its leader.
June 19, 2019 at 02:55 PM
4 minute read
A group of lawyers representing a former member of the Church of Scientology who worked directly with its leader David Miscavige has filed a lawsuit alleging the organization is responsible for decades of human trafficking and intimidation, among other abuses.
The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court on behalf of plaintiff Valerie Haney, claims the church engaged in human trafficking, child abuse, forced labor, exploitative commercial practices and intimidation campaigns aimed at anyone who spoke out against the church or Miscavige.
The church did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the allegations.
“Scientology for decades has sought to quash dissension, cover up its long history of physical, emotional and sexual abuse of its members, including its most vulnerable members, its children, and weaponize its doctrine against those who escape and find the courage to speak up,” said Brian Kent of Laffey, Bucci & Kent in Philadelphia. “This is just the beginning and we are not going to stop until they do.”
University of Pennsylvania professor Marci Hamilton, also a lawyer on the case, said that the church could not defend itself by claiming religious liberty.
“The [Church of Scientology] believers have the right to believe anything they want. But they cannot do whatever they want,” Hamilton said. “This lawsuit continues the important work of the #MeToo era to bring institutions and individuals to account for child abuse, trafficking and neglect.”
Haney, whose identity was confirmed by her attorney though she appeared in the lawsuit as “Jane Doe,” was a member of the church since birth. She claimed in the complaint that she was forced into involuntary servitude as a child by the organization. The lawsuit said that at the age of 15 she joined the “Sea Org,” a subsect composed of Scientology's most dedicated members, where she met Miscavige and began working closely with him at a location known as “Gold Base.”
“In late summer 2005, Miscavige became increasingly hostile and verbally abusive towards his wife, Shelly Miscavige. Eventually, David Miscavige had Shelly removed from the main office as his secretary/assistant in the Gold Base,” according to the complaint. “[Haney], because of her connection to Shelly Miscavige, at the age of 26, was punished by being removed from her position as steward and forced into the 'Hole.'”
The complaint explained that “the Hole is a set of double-wide trailers on Gold Base where senior executives accused of 'ethics violations' were held under strict surveillance. [Haney] was forbidden from having any communication whatsoever with Shelly Miscavige. [Haney] spent three months in the 'Hole' which is, in essence, solitary confinement before being forced to do physical and manual labor.”
Haney alleged that after spending six months in the Hole, she witnessed unidentified individuals pull up in a dark vehicle with tinted windows seize ”Shelly Miscavige, who was crying and visibly distraught, out of the building and put her in the car. Shelly Miscavige has never been seen or heard from again.”
In 2017, Haney left the church and began working for actress and outspoken Scientology critic Leah Remini, according to the complaint. Haney claimed that she was the subject of a subsequent smear campaign as part of the church's “Fair Game” policy, which allegedly targets those who are deemed threats to the church.
She was allegedly called a “paid liar” and “unethical” on multiple platforms. The complaint claimed the church spread the rumor that she was dismissed from her post in the church for being “rampantly promiscuous.”
“In addition to the online smear campaign, defendants have stalked, surveilled, and followed [Haney],” the complaint said. “Beginning in 2017 through June of 2018, defendants and their agents have followed Haney while she was driving. On more than one occasion [Haney] has been forced to change her route in an effort to curtail defendant's surveillance efforts.”
Haney listed seven claims in the lawsuit, including false imprisonment, kidnapping, stalking, libel, slander, invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Trending Stories
- 1De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 2Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
- 3Cannabis Took a Hit on Red Wednesday, but Hope Is On the Way
- 4Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
- 5People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250