IMF Bentham Launches $500M Non-US Fund
The fund is the Australian litigation funder's second focused on disputes outside the U.S.
June 20, 2019 at 12:28 PM
3 minute read
Sydney-based litigation funder IMF Bentham Ltd. has launched a $500 million fund to underwrite disputes outside the United States.
The fund, called Fund 5, is IMF Bentham's second non-U.S. fund and is launching just two years after the litigation funder launched the first, which had an aggregate capital of about $115 million focused on investments in Australia, Asia, Canada and Europe. That fund was upsized in January to about $125 million.
DLA Piper and offshore firm Walkers advised IMF Bentham on the Fund 5 transaction.
IMF Bentham said it is increasing its fund capacity in direct response to increasing demand for dispute resolution finance around the world.
Fund 5 could double to $1 billion as investors have the option to roll into a successor fund on the same terms. IMF Bentham committed $100 million in cash to Fund 5, according to a regulatory filing with the Australian Securities Exchange, and the remaining funds were contributed by external investors, including funds managed by London-based Partners Capital Investment Group, Harvard University's endowment arm Harvard Management Co. Inc., Singapore-based Amitell Capital and Toronto-based Balmoral Wood.
Fund 5 will invest in disputes in Australia, Asia and Canada as well as Europe, the Middle East and Africa, across a broad range of dispute types, including insolvencies, group actions, international arbitration and commercial litigation. In February of this year, Hong Kong began allowing third-party funding of international arbitration. Singapore started allowing it in March 2017.
With Fund 5, IMF Bentham has almost $1.4 billion in combined funds under management globally.
“IMF is experiencing strong market demand for funding across all jurisdictions,” the litigation funder's Perth-based managing director and chief executive officer, Andrew Saker, said in a statement.
Since 2015, IMF Bentham recorded an 85% increase in the number of non-U.S. funding applications and a 149% increase in U.S. funding applications. The demand for dispute resolution finance is growing as a result of increased awareness, the increasing costs of arbitration and litigation and regulatory changes allowing parties to seek dispute resolution finance, Saker explained.
“Demand is particularly strong in Asia and Canada, where dispute resolution finance is still relatively new but it is becoming a mainstream global financial product,” he said.
In April, IMF Bentham partnered with Boies Schiller Flexner to provide up to $30 million in funding capital toward Vietnam-related cross-border disputes.
IMF Bentham has offices in Hong Kong and Singapore in Asia, as well as in Sydney, Perth, Brisbane, Melbourne and Adelaide in Australia.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readLaw Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute read4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Doug Emhoff, Husband of Former VP Harris, Lands at Willkie
- 2LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 3Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 4Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 5The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250