Class Actions Predicted as California's Privacy Law Draws Near
As the law is currently written, consumers have a private right of action when their non-encrypted and nonredacted information is stolen. The law also allows consumers to file a claim even if they do not show actual damage from the data breach, according to a blog post by consulting company Epiq.
June 21, 2019 at 05:22 PM
3 minute read
The California Consumer Privacy Act is set to go into effect Jan. 1, and, according to experts, class action litigation is coming.
The upshot for companies? Get ready. Yesterday.
“We're past the time where companies should have started preparing for the CCPA,” Edward McAndrew, a partner at DLA Piper in Washington, D.C., said.
In April, the 2019 Carlton Fields Class Action Survey indicated that the next wave of class action suits will result from data breaches. The report, citing responses from over 300 general counsel and senior in-house attorneys, indicated that state data privacy laws such as the CCPA will be the reason for an expected uptick in these kinds of class action suits.
As the law is currently written, consumers have a private right of action when their non-encrypted and nonredacted information is stolen. The law also allows consumers to file a claim even if they do not show actual damage from the data breach, according to a blog post by consulting company Epiq.
Cameron Azari, vice president at Epiq, said because it is difficult to show actual damage, historically data breach suits have mixed results. However, not having to show actual damage may make it easier for plaintiffs to succeed.
“I think that plaintiffs attorneys are going to be on the watch for wherever there is a recognized exposure of data,” Azari said.
Active preparation and documenting the steps made to become compliant with the law will also show a presiding court that a company was not negligent with data in the event of the breach. McAndrew said the questions the courts will ask are: Did the company act reasonably and did they act reasonably upon discovery of the breach?
“There is going to be potential liability if the plaintiff can establish that the company did not act reasonably in terms of attempting to secure the data,” McAndrew said.
He said at DLA Piper, he and his colleagues are working on building compliance programs for the CCPA.
Companies should also be preparing for the cost of litigation. McAndrew previously said the cost of discovery alone in one of these cases could be high.
“I suspect that if they aren't budgeting this year, they'll be budgeting next year,” McAndrew said.
It will not just be the multibillion-dollar companies of the world, Azari said. He said he would also expect plaintiffs attorneys to look at smaller companies that can still hold the personal data of tens of thousands of people. Because of the wide net the CCPA and other laws like it cast, compliance departments are becoming more sophisticated.
“None of these corporations want to be involved in a data breach,” Azari said. “I would think it's going to make defendants even more vigilant.”
For best practices, McAndrew said legal departments should look at some of the best practices that state regulators have published on best ways to protect data.
“If companies adopt those, they're going to be well-positioned to argue that they didn't act unreasonably,” McAndrew said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStatute of Limitations Shrivels $5M Jury Award to Less than $1M, 8th Circuit Rules
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readArizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Goodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250