Record Number of Companies Back LGBT Workplace Rights in SCOTUS Brief
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner Todd Anten In New York is counsel of record in the pro bono brief.
July 02, 2019 at 02:24 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A brief set to be filed Wednesday in the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of 206 corporations asserts that ending discrimination against LGBTQ workers is “good for business, employees, and the U.S. economy.”
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner Todd Anten In New York is counsel of record in the pro bono brief, one of a wave of filings expected this week in three consolidated cases set for argument Oct. 8: R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC, Bostock v. Clayton County, and Altitude Express v. Zarda.
➤➤ Legal Speak podcast: Meet the Quinn Emanuel Partner Fighting for LGBT Rights
Together, the three cases raise the question whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits workplace discrimination “because of sex,” can be interpreted to apply to sexual orientation and transgender status.
Federal appeals courts are divided over the scope of protection for gay, lesbian and transgender workers under civil rights laws. The U.S. Justice Department is expected to urge the justices to exclude federal civil-rights protections for those workers.
A statement by the Human Rights Campaign, one of the backers of the brief, boasts that “The landmark brief has more corporate signers than any previous business brief in an LGBTQ non-discrimination case.”
Emphasizing the scale of the support for LGBTQ workers, the brief lists all 206 corporations at both the beginning and end of the filing.
“The 206 businesses that join this brief as amici collectively employ over 7 million employees, and comprise over $5 trillion in revenue,” Anten wrote.
“At this critical moment in the fight for LGBTQ equality, these leading businesses are sending a clear message to the Supreme Court that LGBTQ people should, like their fellow Americans, continue to be protected from discrimination,” said Jay Brown, a vice president of the HRC Foundation.
The companies that joined the brief, Anten said, “support the principle that no one should be passed over for a job, paid less, fired, or subjected to harassment or any other form of discrimination based on their sexual orientation or gender identity … When workplaces are free from discrimination against LGBT employees, everyone can do their best work, with substantial benefits for both employers and employees.”
In 2017, Quinn Emanuel's Anten had filed an amicus brief on behalf of 50 companies supporting broad LGBT workplace rights. He told NLJ in an interview last year that Lambda Legal had reached out to the firm, which had done a pro bono relationship with the advocacy group.
Tuesday's brief (posted below) follows in the footsteps of other mass-business filings in high-profile Supreme Court cases.
In the 2003 affirmative action case Grutter v. Bollinger, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor cited two business briefs and wrote, “Major American businesses have made clear that the skills needed in today's increasingly global marketplace can only be developed through exposure to widely diverse people, cultures, ideas, and viewpoints.” Similar briefs were filed in subsequent affirmative action cases.
In the realm of more recent gay rights cases, businesses have also been vocal in favor of equality. In the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges case, 379 employers and employer organizations filed a brief favoring same-sex marriage. Susan Baker Manning of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius was counsel of record in the same-sex marriage brief.
Read more:
Why a Quinn Emanuel Litigator (and Corporate Clients) Are Fighting for LGBT Workers
Justices Will Hear Major LGBT Workplace Cases, Testing Title VII's Scope
US Appeals Court Is Urged to Protect LGBT Employees Against Discrimination
Justice Dept. Takes Stance Against Transgender Rights—and the EEOC
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStatute of Limitations Shrivels $5M Jury Award to Less than $1M, 8th Circuit Rules
4 minute readStanding Spat: Split 2nd Circuit Lets Challenge to Pfizer Diversity Program Proceed
Fight Over Amicus-Funding Disclosure Surfaces in Google Play Appeal
'Self-Diagnosed Nickel Allergy' Fails to Find Success in Med-Mal Suit, 8th Circuit Rules
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250