Critical Mass: An Opioid Bankruptcy Brouhaha Bubbles Up. Boeing Wants 737 Max 8 Lawsuits in Illinois. Roundup Judge Calls Monsanto 'Pretty Crass.'
Last month's Chapter 11 bankruptcy of Insys Therapeutics triggered outcries from several state attorneys general with pending suits against the opioid company.
July 03, 2019 at 12:32 PM
5 minute read
Welcome to Critical Mass, Law.com's weekly briefing for class action and mass tort attorneys. Here's what's going on: Several state AGs with lawsuits over the opioid crisis have balked at Insys' bankruptcy plans. Boeing wants to MDL lawsuits brought over the grounded 737 Max 8 aircraft. A federal judge reviewing an $80 million Roundup verdict called Monsanto “pretty crass” in how it dealt with cancer claims.
Please feel free to share your thoughts or comments. You can reach me at [email protected], or find me on Twitter: @abronstadlaw
|
Bankruptcy Battles Over Opioid Lawsuits
Last month's Chapter 11 bankruptcy of Insys Therapeutics triggered outcries from several state attorneys general with pending suits against the opioid company. A federal bankruptcy judge in Delaware is hearing arguments this month.
At a hearing yesterday: AGs from Minnesota, Maryland, New Jersey, New Yorkand Arizona insisted that the automatic stay of bankruptcy shouldn't apply to their cases. Both Minnesota and Maryland have administrative trials starting in August and September.
One state that's not objecting: Florida, which cut a deal with Insys to hold off on its claims.
But Florida's AG has another beef: a proposal from Insys to estimate the costs of 1,000 lawsuits against it. Attorneys general from New Jersey, New York, Kentucky, Rhode Island and Washington have joined Florida in calling this plan premature. It's scheduled for a July 8 hearing.
I spoke with Kenneth Ayotte (Berkeley Law), who said the states might have a “good chance” challenging the bankruptcy stay. As for the estimation of claims, he said this might be what Insys has in mind:
“The whole idea of the estimation is to prevent the case from being delayed. You need to reorganize. You need to have a creditor vote, and you can't conduct a vote unless you estimate the claims. If you're conducting a 363 sale, a sale of the assets free and clear, you don't have to do that. They may have a weak argument as to why they need to do the estimation now.”
|
Boeing Wants MDL Over Max 8 Crash Lawsuits
Weeks after agreeing to mediate lawsuits brought over last year's crash in Indonesia, Boeing moved to coordinate dozens of other cases involving the March 10 crash in Ethiopia that grounded the 737 Max 8 aircraft. On June 19, Boeing, repped by Mack Shultz (Perkins Coie), moved to create multidistrict litigation over the Ethiopia crash in the Northern District of Illinois.
Boeing estimated that there were 51 lawsuits filed on behalf of passengers. Here's what's odd: All but three cases are already in the Northern District of Illinois.
The others are in South Carolina. Mary Schiavo (Motley Rice), whose firm filed those cases, told me Boeing wants an MDL for four reasons:
“1. For the convenience of Boeing's lawyers; 2. Boeing often chooses to defend in Chicago where its corporate headquarters is located; 3. South Carolina law is much more favorable to the families of the passengers as it allows unlimited punitive damages if the federal criminal probe against Boeing is successful, so Boeing would not want to be subjected to a South Carolina jury with SC punitive damages law; and 4. because the law provides for a consolidation when more than 75 persons are killed, and thus, Boeing is entitled to an MDL, and therefore we are not going to oppose the MDL consolidation.”
|
Monsanto “Pretty Crass,” Judge Says
A federal judge appeared unlikely to toss an $80 million Roundup verdict on Tuesday, calling Monsanto “pretty crass” about how it handled claims linking its herbicide to non-Hodgkin lymphoma. At a hearing on Monsanto's motions to reverse the award, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria raised questions about the jury's $2 million award in non-economic damages. He also asked about the appropriate ratio between compensatory damages and the jury's $75 million award in punitive damages. While punitive damages were “supportable,” he said, Monsanto's conduct was not “so outrageous” that they shouldn't be reduced.
Here's what else is happening:
Koh's Questions: U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh had more questions for lawyers attempting to get approval of a $117.5 million data breach settlement with Yahoo. After the judge rejected their initial $85 million deal, lawyers were back in court last week with a revised agreement. But Koh still wanted to know why 32 plaintiffs' firms were involved in the case, and she had concerns about the notice to class members.
Down Under: Class actions in Australia have ramped up, spurred by outside litigation funding and government probes into financial firms. According to law professor Vince Morabito (Monash University), 64 class actions were brought in Australia in 2018, with another 18 so far this year. One wrinkle: An upcoming Australia High Court decision on common fund orders could make it more expensive to bring class actions.
What's in a Name? The American Association for Justice took its name to heart and sued a California organization for trademark infringement. The AAJ, which was known as the Association of Trial Lawyers of America until 2006, sued the Association of American Trial Lawyers, which focuses on lawyer rankings such as the “Top 100” or “40 Under 40.” Sacramento personal injury attorney John Steiner (John Steiner Law Offices) registered the mark.
Thanks for reading Critical Mass! Have a good July 4th holiday. I plan to extend the holiday, so my colleague Max Mitchell will be filling in for me next week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Courts, Lawyers Press On With Business as SoCal Wildfires Rage
- 2Florida, a Political Epicenter, Is the Site of Brownstein Hyatt's 13th Office
- 3Law Firms Close Southern California Offices Amid Devastating Wildfires
- 4Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
- 5Holland & Knight Picks Up 8 Private Wealth Lawyers in Los Angeles
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250