Finnegan Names Firm Lifers as Next Managing Partner, New Chair
The IP powerhouse elected Anand Sharma its next managing partner. His predecessor, Mark Sweet, will be the new firm chair.
July 09, 2019 at 12:28 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner has named Anand Sharma the firm's new managing partner, replacing Mark Sweet, who will assume the role of firm chair.
The Washington, D.C.-based intellectual property firm said Sharma, whose term began July 1, is the firm's first managing partner of color.
Sweet is replacing James Monroe, who presided over a three-year term in which the firm's revenue and head count remained steady as other large IP firms have struggled to compete. Sweet, who joined Finnegan while still finishing law school, said in a statement that he will focus on implementing new technology solutions and focus on the firm's overall strategic direction as chair.
“It has been an honor to serve as Finnegan's managing partner for the last three years, and I am excited to take on the role as chair to ensure that as a firm we continue to fully integrate with the business objectives of our clients,” Sweet said.
In his new role, Sharma will manage the day-to-day operations of the 284-lawyer firm, which is known for its competitive IP practice and has 10 offices worldwide.
“This is an opportunity to manage a firm that has a long history of excellence in the intellectual-property space, which is the focus of our practice,” said Sharma in a dawn phone call from Seoul, South Korea, where he had traveled for a client meeting in one of Finnegan's Asian offices.
Sharma noted that the firm faces fierce competition in the intellectual property area. He named Fish & Richardson as a competitor, but added that with few other major boutique IP firms in the market, Finnegan also competes with general Big Law firms with strong IP practices.
“One of my first goals is to apply my perspectives and my view to help us maintain this history and keep us at the top,” he said.
This perspective, he said, is in part his long history at Finnegan, which began when he was a second-year summer associate at the firm in 1995. He was hired after graduation and made partner in 2006.
“I haven't updated my resume since the second year of law school,” he said. “It's been a very happy ride.”
Sharma majored in mechanical engineering as a undergrad and had a stint as a NASA software engineer. In his more than 20 years at Finnegan, Sharma built what he called a somewhat “blended practice” focusing on patent prosecution and litigation.
But, “there's another side to me,” he said. “It's not just my background as a lawyer, but also my background from a cultural perspective.” Sharma was born in Guyana, South America, and is of East Indian descent. He and his family came to the United States when he was a child, when his father attended Howard University.
His appointment as managing partner also makes Finnegan one of the largest firms to be led by someone of South Asian descent, according to the firm. Additionally, 66% of the firm's new management team—all of whom are appointed to three-year terms—are women or people of color, the firm said.
“Because we've long been this firm that's focused on IP, we have a unique set of accrued knowledge,” Sharma said. “We'll be working to continue to turn legal experiences and technology expertise as scientists into efficient solutions for clients.”
Sharma said that looking beyond just legal problems, he hopes to partner with clients on joint pro bono opportunities and expanding diversity and inclusion initiatives. It's an arena in which he has experience: Sharma chaired the firm's first official diversity and inclusion team a decade ago after he formalized the firm's diversity efforts into a group, and he held the leadership position for four years.
He said the visibility he's received by being promoted to managing partner is also an important step in making the legal world more inclusive to different backgrounds and perspectives.
“I thought it was important, not just because the firm thought my perspective could add value, but also from the outside looking in because not a lot of partners of color get this experience,” he said. “This is important externally to show there are opportunities to be involved.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250