Morrison & Foerster Settles Macquarie's $35M Puda Coal Malpractice Suit
The apparent settlement comes less than two years after the malpractice suit was revived by a New York appellate court.
July 10, 2019 at 01:18 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Morrison & Foerster has settled a $35 million legal malpractice lawsuit brought by a unit of the Australian investment bank Macquarie that claimed the law firm failed to spot red flags in its work on a Chinese coal company's stock offering, according to court papers.
The apparent settlement, in a four-year-old high-profile case against the Am Law 100 firm, comes less than two years after the malpractice suit was revived by a New York appellate court.
In a Monday filing, the parties told Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Saliann Scarpulla that they wanted to put off a conference set for Wednesday because “the parties have reached a settlement.” A letter filed a month before mentioned a settlement in principle. The settlement has not previously been reported.
The deal, whose terms haven't been made public, could put a long-simmering legal risk to bed for Morrison & Foerster that emerged after it was revealed that Puda Coal Inc., whose offering on the New York Stock Exchange was being underwritten by Macquarie, was essentially an empty shell.
Puda Coal claimed that it operated through its 90% stake in Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co. Ltd., but the Shanxi stake was actually transferred to Puda's chairman before the U.S. offering. Kroll Associates, the investigative firm, noted the discrepancy in a report, but a banker at Macquarie sent the report to his colleagues and to Morrison & Foerster saying “no red flags were identified.”
The lawsuit was initially dismissed in 2016, with Scarpulla saying that Macquarie can't blame its lawyers for failing to alert it to information that was already in its possession. But the Appellate Division, First Department reversed that ruling in early 2018.
Recent court filings indicate that discovery was underway when the case was settled. In a May letter regarding depositions, one of Morrison & Foerster's lawyers, Williams & Connolly partner John Williams, pegged potential damages at $35 million.
Macquarie may have sought damages including amounts related to a $15 million settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It was also sued by investors in Puda Coal who were wiped out when the company's fraud was revealed. The bank agreed to pay $7 million in that case.
Another bank that blamed Morrison & Foerster for Puda Coal-related losses didn't make it to discovery. An appellate court upheld the dismissal of Brean Murray, Carret & Co LLC's malpractice suit against Morrison & Foerster.
A spokesperson for Morrison & Foerster said the firm ”values its relationship with Macquarie and is pleased to have this matter behind us.”
John Tortorella of Marino, Tortorella & Boyle, who represents Macquarie, didn't immediately return a message seeking comment. Neither did Jonathan Lupkin, a lawyer who runs his own firm and who represents Morrison & Foerster.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
Hunt for Lithium Puts Latin American Lawyers in the Crosshairs
Lukoil Pan Americas Sues Investment Firm Over Alleged $18 Million Breach
North Dakota Court Clarifies Natural Accumulation Rule in Matter of First Impression
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 2Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 3Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
- 4To Avoid Conflict, NYAG Hands Probe Into Inmate's Beating Death to Syracuse-Area DA
- 5Scripture-Quoting Employee Sues Company for Supporting LGBTQ Pride
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250