DOL Fiduciary Rule Hangs in Balance as Labor Secretary Acosta Resigns
Acosta's resignation "will affect the development of any guidance that could be controversial," says lawyer Fred Reish.
July 12, 2019 at 10:39 AM
3 minute read
Federal RegulationThe original version of this story was published on Law.com
Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta is resigning his post due to pressure over his handling of the sex trafficking case against hedge fund manager Jeffrey Epstein.
Acosta and President Donald Trump appeared at the White House Friday morning to announced Acosta's resignation.
In a statement on Monday, Acosta reiterated that he was "pleased" that "the New York prosecution is going forward," referring to Epstein being arrested by federal authorities on Saturday and charged with the sex trafficking of minors. The new charges against Epstein, "who's now a registered sex offender," Acosta said, "are a very, very good thing."
U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra of the Southern District of Florida ruled in late February that prosecutors — including Acosta — broke federal law in their handling of a case against Florida billionaire Epstein, who ran a global child sex ring between 1999 and 2007.
Acosta's departure could delay the release of a new fiduciary rule by Labor.
Trump announced Friday morning that Patrick Pizzella, Acosta's deputy, will serve as the acting Labor secretary. Pizzella was confirmed to serve as deputy Labor secretary in April 2018, and previously served as a member of the Federal Labor Relations Authority under President Barack Obama.
Acosta's resignation "will affect the development of any guidance that could be controversial or that could have significant consequences," said Fred Reish, partner at Drinker Biddle.
Labor employees "will continue to work on regulations and other guidance," Reish said. If Acosta's replacement "has an anti-regulatory approach, we may not see a new fiduciary regulation during this administration."
Labor's spring regulatory flexibility agenda said Labor would issue a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding a new fiduciary rule in December.
An earlier unveiling of a Labor fiduciary plan could be likely given the Securities and Exchange Commission's passage of its advice standards package, including Regulation Best Interest, on June 5.
Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta told lawmakers on May 1 that Labor was collaborating with the SEC as it worked on its advice-standards package, and that "based on our collaborative work, we will be issuing new rules in this area."
Preston Rutledge, head of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration, said on June 3 that Labor's upcoming fiduciary rulemaking would align with Reg BI.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250