Report: Cannabis In-House Counsel Expect to Spend More to Keep Up With Market
Many in-house counsel, according to the report, have growing concerns over cannabis-related litigation.
July 15, 2019 at 05:25 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Fifty-six percent of general counsel and in-house counsel believe in the next couple years they will need to increase their legal resources to keep up with the cannabis market, according to a report published by ALM and Shook, Hardy & Bacon.
Many in-house counsel, according to the report, have growing concerns over cannabis-related litigation. Jean Smith Gonnell, general counsel at STWC Holdings Inc., said she is not surprised that more resources will be spent on litigation.
"It's a very competitive market and it's going to grow and it's going to continue growing," Gonnell said. "Litigation is definitely one of those things that is going to grow."
According to the report, general counsel overwhelmingly believe they will need to tackle product labeling and products liability in the next two years. Ten percent of respondents indicated they spend resources for product labeling now; however, 32% of respondents believe they will need to dedicate more resources to product labeling in two years. Fifteen percent of respondents say they now dedicate time to products liability concerns, but in two years 31% say they plan on dedicating more resources to products liability cases.
"At the moment there is not a lot of pending litigation in that space," said Michael Barnett, a partner at Shook, Hardy & Bacon in Kansas City, Missouri.
Barnett said litigation concerns grow with the industry as it matures. He explained there are a lot of claims made about cannabis products that the Food and Drug Administration and regulators have taken stances on, and that is where the litigation will come from.
"Generally plaintiffs' lawyers take some guidance from those agencies and start to piggyback on top of them," Barnett said. "As the industry matures we expect to see more things moving from simple enforcement actions into the private litigation world."
Katie Gates Calderon, a partner at Shook, Hardy & Bacon in Kansas City, said those types of risk analysis and concerns in the cannabis industry are similar to those in any other product industry.
"Our clients who are getting into this industry are concerned about the same types of things that they would be with any other product like what do their labels say, are they making claims, what can they do with marketing, what can't they do?" Calderon said.
An area that remains a high priority for in-house counsel is the FDA and other regulators, according to the report. Fifty-eight percent of respondents said in the next two years they expect a majority of their legal needs will be surrounding the FDA and growing state regulation.
"In places like Colorado, for instance, there are more regulations pertaining to hemp," Gonnell explained. "I think it's going to expand. There are a lot of industry groups that want guidance so you're seeing different portions of state governments putting forth their own stamp on different things."
FDA regulatory guidance is one of the larger concerns, Calderon said.
"The CBD industry and all the various forms of how it is ingested kind of took before FDA had the chance to get its arms around everything," Calderon said. CBD, or cannabidiol, is a compound found in cannabis.
The FDA has stated CBD in food products is prohibited, Calderon said, although there are stores that sell those products and the industry for those products continues to grow. There is also an issue of states that allow CBD-infused food, while acknowledging that the FDA says those products are prohibited.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStatute of Limitations Shrivels $5M Jury Award to Less than $1M, 8th Circuit Rules
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readArizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Goodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250