Eversheds Sutherland Announces San Diego Branch, Eyes More US Locations
A trio of Foley & Lardner IP partners will launch the new Eversheds outpost. Meanwhile, Eversheds is considering additional locations in California.
July 17, 2019 at 03:29 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Eversheds Sutherland said Wednesday it's launching a San Diego office with three intellectual property litigators from Foley & Lardner.
The trio of partners, Jose Patino, Nicola Pisano and Christopher Bolten, are expected to join Eversheds within the next couple of weeks. Meanwhile, Eversheds is talking with lawyers in other practices in San Diego and considering additional locations in California, said the firm's co-CEO, Mark Wasserman, in an interview.
This is the second U.S. office Eversheds has opened this year, following a Chicago outpost in May. The firm has been expanding aggressively since its creation in 2017 from a trans-Atlantic tie-up between the U.K.'s Eversheds and Atlanta-based Sutherland Asbill & Brennan. Eversheds launched the Chicago office—its first new U.S. location since the 2017 combination—with two real estate partners from White & Case and Kirkland & Ellis.
U.S. expansion is now a top priority, said Wasserman, after an initial focus on integrating the legacy Eversheds and Sutherland firms.
Adding the IP group in San Diego “is part of our strategy for U.S. growth,” Wasserman said, adding that he expects additional lawyers and staff from Foley & Lardner to join the trio at Eversheds.
Eversheds is also talking to lawyers with corporate, litigation or tax practices in San Diego, he said. “We think there are other opportunities.”
Eversheds has about 2,800 lawyers globally in 69 offices, and its U.S. lawyers make up about 20% of its total head count. It has added about 220 lawyers worldwide in the 2.5 years since the legacy firms combined, Wasserman said, and opened offices in Moscow, St. Petersburg, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The San Diego location will give Eversheds eight U.S. offices. Besides Atlanta and Chicago, it has lawyers in Washington, New York, Houston, Austin and Sacramento.
Eversheds is initially leasing about 13,000 square feet at Paseo del Mar, located at 12255 El Camino Real in San Diego. “It's a relatively short lease, as we see who else we're adding,” Wasserman said.
The Foley & Lardner partners' IP practice is focused on life sciences, medical device and telecom technologies—all hot industries in San Diego.
“This group has a robust practice with clients based in the U.S., Asia and Europe,” said Pete Pappas, the U.S. co-head of Eversheds' global IP group.
The group's location in San Diego is “particularly appealing,” he added, because the city is a global hub for life sciences and biotechnology. It's the No. 1 originator of life sciences patent applications in the country.
Patino has represented companies including Bridge Medical, Huawei Technologies and ReShape Medical (now part of EnteroMedics) in patent disputes. In addition to litigation, Pisano and Bolten handle patent prosecution, advise startups on their worldwide patent portfolios and perform IP due diligence for venture capital firms' investment targets.
The trio also handles some trademark, copyright and trade secret work, Pappas said.
Increasing the “depth and breadth” of Eversheds' U.S. IP practice is a recruiting priority, he said, adding that the firm has an extensive global practice in that area, because clients worldwide are concerned with IP protection and defense.
Since the combination, Eversheds has added a six-lawyer, China-focused IP team in Hong Kong and Singapore, Pappas said, and is “actively recruiting” more patent attorneys in Europe, particularly in Germany and the U.K.
|US Growth Plans
In the United States, Eversheds is “very interested” in growing in California, Wasserman said, adding that the firm is also talking to lawyers in Los Angeles and San Francisco.
“We would be happy to add this group wherever they were located,” he said of the Foley & Lardner partners. “And it's a perfect opportunity to get more of a foothold in California.”
Eversheds also will continue adding lawyers to its existing offices in Texas, New York and Chicago, Wasserman said. “We're talking to a lot of people in New York, and I expect we will be adding other people in Chicago as well over the next few months.”
That kind of growth push is expensive, Wasserman acknowledged. “We planned for it at the beginning of the year when we set the budget,” he said. “It takes a good amount of startup capital to open offices in big cities. We're at the right time to invest those dollars.”
Eversheds reported a 10% increase in global revenue for 2018 to $1.175 billion.
“Our partners understand that we are making some investments,” Wasserman said. “It comes out of money they would otherwise be paid themselves, but they understand it is for the long term.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250