The Blog Must Go On for This Law Dean
Pepperdine University Law Dean Paul Caron reflects on his two years of running a law school while also publishing his widely read TaxProf Blog, which chronicles legal education's biggest stories.
July 17, 2019 at 03:05 PM
6 minute read
Paul Caron—legal education's so-called Blog Emperor—took the reins at Pepperdine University School of Law in 2017, and his two years as dean have been a remarkable ride.
Things got off to a rough start in the spring of 2018 when the school was removed from the U.S. News & World Report rankings after Pepperdine discovered a mistake in the data it submitted that artificially increased its ranking and reported it to the publication. (Pepperdine returned to the ranking this year, moving up from its previous No. 72 to No. 51).
The challenges didn't end there. In November, a Pepperdine law student was present at a nearby music venue when an armed man opened fire, killing 12. The law student was unharmed but the massacre, in which a Pepperdine undergraduate died, shook the Malibu, California, campus. A day later, the so-called Woolsey Fire tore through the area and came close to leveling the campus. The law school was spared, but closed for more than two weeks in the aftermath.
Through it all, Caron maintained his role as the town crier of legal education with his TaxProf Blog, which aggregates news about tax law and law schools. The 15-year-old blog is a must-read for legal educators and has become an important tool to raise Pepperdine's profile and stature in the academy. Caron posts stories about events and initiatives at Pepperdine, not to mention plenty of photos of its seaside campus. Law.com caught up with Caron this week to discuss juggling the blog with his dean duties and why he hasn't given TaxProf Blog up. His answers have been edited for length and clarity.
I remember your telling me that some people suggested that you shutter TaxProf Blog when you became dean. How do you feel about that advice now? I respect the folks who made that suggestion. There were two parts to that. The one that has proven true is that the job of being dean of a law school is more than a full-time job. Part of their advice was that it would be impossible to do the job of dean and also all the work that's involved in the blog, and there wouldn't be enough hours in the day. That certainly has been a challenge. That advice was sound—I have a very hectic life. It's a lot of work to do both jobs well.
The second reason some folks said I should stop doing it is because they feared for me that the blog would be controversial and that if I covered things that were controversial, inevitably some folks would get upset and hold it against me and, by extension, Pepperdine. I thought long and hard about that. But what has proven to be the case is that I don't say controversial things on my blog. I point out news about legal education, and I do that in an objective way, I think. It hasn't been a problem in the way some people thought it might be.
What's the benefit of continuing to blog? I think it gives visibility to me and the school, in the sense that if people find the blog a valuable service, then hopefully they think I'm adding value as an individual and hopefully some of that goes to Pepperdine's benefit. When I go to academic conferences, I do get folks coming up to me from time to time thanking me for doing the blog.
How much of Pepperdine's recent rise in the U.S. News rankings do you think is tied to the blog and your ability to spotlight the school? There's no way to tell. It's hard to separate out because the school is doing a lot of things well. We've been very successful in fundraising, and there's a lot of good things happening at the law school, generally. But one thing I'd like to think the blog helps with is that this year the school had its highest peer-ranking score ever. That's a vote of law school deans and professors. I would like to think that's a platform where the blog helped a bit.
How much time do you spend on the blog, versus dean duties? I've tried to create systems where I primarily do the blog in the very early morning, and then again at night. So during my 8-to-5 day, I can focus on all the other things that come with the dean job. I try to take weekend time when I have it. The way technology is, I can schedule things to appear [on the blog] later. I'm a member of the 4 a.m. club—I get up really early and pound out some things. I also have some professors at other schools who help with content. And then I have folks [at Pepperdine] who help with some of the mechanics of posting and putting charts together.
Are there ever stories or articles that you would have put on the blog before you were dean that you have second thoughts about now? I've always been sensitive to that. I don't want to put gossipy things on the blog. I've always been wary of posting when something bad happens at a law school. But when things rise in legal education to where [Law.com] is writing about it and the ABA Journal is writing about it, people come to the blog to make sure that they're up to date on what's happening. I will then report on it. All I'm doing is curating content talking about the issues.
What has been the toughest part of being a law school dean thus far? I think it's just that legal education has been going through some hard times. There have been some challenges in getting resources from the university and friends, so the challenge is to have the school get on sound financial footing, which I think we have now with the smaller size of the class. The financial piece has been a challenge, without a doubt, but with every challenge there is an opportunity to rethink what's you're doing and reassess your priorities.
How has the fire changed Pepperdine? Is everything back to normal? What's sort of interesting is that after the fire we got heavy amounts of rain. That brought some initial challenges in the areas that burned because didn't have vegetation with roots. There was the potential for landslides. But after we got through that, all of that rain created a rejuvenated greenbelt around campus. There was a time it looked almost like we were in Ireland, everything was so green. It has been an interesting transition from November.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250