LexisNexis Forms Contract Analytics Joint Venture with Axiom Spin-Off Knowable
Knowable will operate independently and will be led Axiom co-founders Mark Harris and Alec Guettel, but will have access to LexisNexis' brand, resources and infrastructure following its investment.
July 18, 2019 at 03:30 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
|
LexisNexis Legal & Professional has not been shy about investing in analytics technologies in recent years, with Lex Machina and Ravel Law among the acquisitions they've made to bolster their data suite. Now, the company is moving into contract analytics, forming a venture with data analytics company Knowable.
The two announced on July 18 that the companies have entered into an agreement to form a joint venture via LexisNexis investment in Knowable. Through the deal, Knowable will remain independent, though will receive access to LexisNexis' brand, resources and infrastructure, according to a press release announcing the deal.
Knowable spun off from alternative legal service provider Axiom in February 2019 as it prepared for an IPO. Axiom co-founders Mark Harris and Alec Guettel will lead Knowable as CEO and CFO, respectively. No financial details of the transaction have been made public at this time.
Focused heavily on the enterprise contract space, Knowable's technology offerings include machine-learning enabled data analytics and related contract intelligence solutions. The company boasts more than 25 million contract data elements analyzed each quarter and engagements with more than 80 percent of the Fortune 500, according to the Knowable's website.
Ritu Khanna, executive vice president of strategy and business development at LexisNexis, told Legaltech News that new partners for data analytics and decision tools are always on the company's radar, and the opportunity to work with Knowable's Harris and Guettel “worked out perfectly for us.”
“We really appreciate the vision and the thinking that Mark and his team are bringing around unstructured data, particularly in contracts, into understandable analytics and data that can drive actions and decision-making on behalf of our customers, both in law firms and in corporations,” Khanna added. “We think that it's a solution that's really ahead of the pack, and it's going to transform how our customers make decisions.”
Harris noted to Legaltech News that contracts have a great effect on the corporate market in particular given that they are “the backbone of business,” though in their current unstructured form they are hard to mine for actionable insights. “Those contracts are basically codifying all commercial activity, and they sit inside corporations as one of those great underleveraged, undermanaged information assets,” Harris explained. “There is so much intelligence and potential impact sitting inside those contracts, but today it's very hard to get at.”
That's what his team is hoping to fix—Harris said that after the deal, he expects Knowable to continue largely as it has, perhaps broadening its suite of offerings in the next couple of years. The differentiation for Knowable's technology, he believes, will be the product's data accuracy rate (Knowable boasts 98 percent accuracy on its website) and its access to raw data to train its systems.
Coupled with LexisNexis' backing, Knowable's leaders are excited for the future. “Together we've come up with this structure that I think is going to really empower us to build a great business and do it in a way that makes sense in this space, for this team and for our clients,” Harris said.
LexisNexis' recent analytics acquisitions have increasingly become integrated into the company's overall analytics suite in recent months. Ravel Law, for instance, is largely behind the Lexis Advance's Context offering, which just introduced its first expansion in Context for Courts this week. The company also introduced an intelligent 'Research Assistant' for Lexis Advance at Legalweek 2019, and have integrated analytics into other LexisNexis legal-focused products such as CounselLink as well.
This article has been updated with comments from LexisNexis and Knowable.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readJudge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250