Cannabis Company's Social Posts Catch FDA's Eye (And a Warning Letter)
"Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in legal action without further notice," the FDA said in a letter to Massachusetts-based Curaleaf.
July 23, 2019 at 07:56 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Federal regulators Tuesday threatened cannabis giant Curaleaf with possible legal action for allegedly making unsubstantiated medical claims about the cannabidiol, or CBD, products on its website and on social media.
In a public letter, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration gave Massachusetts-based Curaleaf about two weeks to explain what it has done to correct alleged violations, including website claims that CBD has "properties that counteract the growth of spread of cancer" and is "linked to the effective treatment of Alzheimer's disease."
➤➤ Get the latest cannabis lawyering, compliance and commentary straight to your inbox with Higher Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
"Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in legal action without further notice, including, without limitation, seizure and injunction," the FDA said in its letter, signed by compliance directors Eric Nelson and Donald Ashley, a former Justice Department lawyer and King & Spalding litigation associate.
In a statement, Curaleaf said it "is fully committed to complying with FDA requirements for all of the products that it markets. We can reaffirm that nothing in the letter raises any issues concerning the safety of any Curaleaf product. Curaleaf products are all derived from hemp and meet the requirements of the Farm bill."
Many of the claims cited by the FDA letter could not be found on the company's website Tuesday.
Curaleaf recently announced it is poised to become the biggest cannabis company in the world, based on revenue, with its planned acquisition of GR Companies Inc. Loeb & Loeb and Stikeman Elliott served as legal advisers to Curalee the cash-and-stock deal valued at $875 million.
Federal law bars the sale of food containing CBD or the marketing of CBD products as dietary supplements. But that hasn't stopped CBD-containing dog food, cosmetics, coffee and cookies from being sold in some places around the country. Sales of hemp-derived, marijuana-derived and pharmaceutical CBD are expected to top $2.3 billion by 2022, according to cannabis analyst company New Frontier Data.
Then-FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb issued an advisory in April warning companies that the agency would pursue CBD sellers making "egregious, over-the-line claims."
"The FDA continues to be concerned about the proliferation of egregious medical claims being made about products asserting to contain CBD that haven't been approved by the FDA," Gottlieb wrote. "The FDA stands ready to protect consumers from companies illegally selling CBD products that claim to prevent, diagnose, treat, or cure serious diseases, such as cancer, Alzheimer's disease, psychiatric disorders and diabetes."
The FDA that day, in conjunction with the Federal Trade Commission, issued warning letters to three companies that allegedly made unfounded claims about their products' benefits.
Acknowledging pressure from manufacturers and members of Congress, however, the FDA hosted a hearing in May to take public comments on potential uses and abuses of CBD. An agency working group is also studying ways that CBD-containing dietary supplements and food could be legally marketed.
Read more:
Hogan Lovells Joins Ninth Circuit Fight Over Seized Hemp
The IRS Keeps Winning Marijuana Cases in US Appeals Courts
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill GOP-Led Senate, House Move to Repeal Biden's Late Regulations as Law Provides?
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readJudicial Appointments After Casey: Observers Wary but Hopeful Bipartisan Spirit Will Continue
FDA Defends Rejection of Vape-Flavor Applications Before Sympathetic Supreme Court
Trending Stories
- 1Court Rejects San Francisco's Challenge to Robotaxi Licenses
- 2'Be Prepared and Practice': Paul Hastings' Michelle Reed Breaks Down Firm's First SEC Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure Report
- 3Lina Khan Gives Up the Gavel After Contentious 4 Years as FTC Chair
- 4Allstate Is Using Cell Phone Data to Raise Prices, Attorney General Claims
- 5Epiq Announces AI Discovery Assistant, Initially Developed by Laer AI, With Help From Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250