Penn Law Condemns Amy Wax's Comments as Racist and Says She's Taking a Sabbatical
Hundreds of University of Pennsylvania students and alumni called for the law professor to be removed from teaching following her remarks on immigration at a national conference for conservatives.
July 23, 2019 at 01:10 PM
6 minute read
The dean of the University of Pennsylvania Law School on Tuesday condemned as racist comments made last week by controversial professor Amy Wax, but he did not say she will be pulled from the classroom as a result—a move hundreds of outraged students and alumni have demanded.
Still, Wax won't be teaching during the upcoming year, according to law school spokesman Steve Barnes. She will be taking a planned sabbatical instead. Barnes declined to comment on whether Wax will still teach once her sabbatical is over.
Wax spoke last week on an immigration panel at the National Conservatism Conference. A July 17 article in Vox described Wax as “explicitly advocating” an immigration policy that favors people from Western countries over those from non-Western countries. Wax was quoted as saying America “will be better off with more whites and fewer nonwhites,” and defending that position by saying that the preference is based on culture and not race.
Following an outcry among students and other critics, Wax said she was misquoted in the Vox article and that other media outlets had amplified the error. But the law school reviewed several media sources and concluded that the essence of what Vox had reported was accurate.
“At best, the reported remarks espouse a bigoted theory of white cultural and ethnic supremacy; at worst, they are racist,” Dean Ted Ruger wrote in a message to the law school community. “Under any framing, such views are repugnant to the core values and institutional practices of both Penn Law and the University of Pennsylvania.”
Wax did not immediately respond to a request to comment on Ruger's condemnation of her statements or whether her sabbatical had been previously planned for the upcoming school year.
In the wake of the Vox story, the law school's Latinx Law Students Association drafted a petition calling on the school to remove Wax from teaching, among other changes focused on diversity and inclusion. Several hundred current Penn students and alumni signed it, as did more than 1,500 others. The petition was sponsored or co-sponsored by 10 other Penn Law student organizations, which argued that Wax's latest and previous comments on immigration and affirmative action have made minority students feel unwelcome.
“Throughout her tenure at Penn Law, Professor Wax has continuously antagonized students of color and the Penn community,” the petition reads. “In the two years since Professor Wax disparaged our Black classmates, students of color have continued to feel marginalized, isolated, unsupported, and unprioritized.”
In a statement issued in response to Ruger's message to the law school community, the Latinx Law Students Association—along with five other Penn Law affinity groups and student organizations—said the dean had failed to address their specific demands regarding Wax and diversity on campus.
“While we will always celebrate the hiring of more diverse tenure and tenure-track professors, we know that there are many students who do not agree with Dean Ruger's assessment that Penn has achieved concrete results or structural changes when it comes to creating a more inclusive environment for students of color,” reads the response from the student groups. “In fact, the administration undermines its own efforts to make Penn Law a more diverse and inclusive community by continuing to provide a platform for Professor Wax to spew her baseless views.”
Penn Law is complicit in perpetuating white supremacy as long as Wax remains on the faculty, the students wrote.
Wax's sabbatical plans have landed in the news before. She wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal in February of 2018 that claimed Ruger asked her to take a leave of absence in the wake of an earlier controversy about an op-ed she co-authored in 2017 that many viewed as racist—which she framed as an example of ongoing attacks on campus free speech.
Barnes refuted that claim at the time, saying instead that Ruger had a routine discussion about taking a scheduled sabbatical.
“Mentioned in her recent op-ed was a discussion with the dean about the timing of a regularly-accrued sabbatical, a discussion the dean has with many faculty members each year, as every tenured faculty member enjoys a sabbatical benefit, with full pay,” Barnes said.
Wax again found herself at the center of controversy in the spring of 2018, when video surfaced of an earlier interview she had done in which she alleged that black students underperform at Penn Law—part of her argument against affirmative action. “I don't think I've ever seen a black student graduate in the top quarter of the class, and rarely in the top half,” she told interviewer Glenn Loury, an economics professor at Brown University.
Ruger refuted Wax's claim that black students don't succeed at the law school and she was removed from teaching required first-year courses—an action students demanded after both the 2017 op-ed and after her affirmative action comments. Ruger said Wax had violated confidentiality rules surrounding grades.
In his statement Tuesday, Ruger wrote that attracting diverse students, faculty and staff is the school's highest priority and that he appreciates the engagement of students and alumni on the matter. He added that he understands the “pain and outrage” that many feel regarding Wax's comments.
“My colleagues and I pledge to work with you so that together we can heal, and learn from this experience and each other,” Ruger wrote. “That students from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds are flourishing at this school and in their subsequent careers is an unassailable rebuke to those who question their full participation in our academic enterprise and our nation.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250