New York Is Barred, for Now, From Handing Over Trump's State Tax Returns
Trump's suing New York and House Democrats in DC federal district court to block any disclosure of his state tax returns. His case tests New York's "Trust Act."
August 01, 2019 at 06:01 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A federal judge on Thursday temporarily barred New York officials from any effort to release President Donald Trump’s state tax returns to U.S. House Democrats while the state and lawyers for the president fight over whether the Washington trial court is the proper venue for the dispute.
U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols of the District of Columbia said this week that Trump’s lawsuit against New York and the House Ways and Means Committee presented a “conundrum.” House Democrats have not yet made the request that Trump is suing to block. Still, Nichols sympathized with the president’s concern that House Democrats could ask for the tax returns at any moment and New York could turn them over without any notice.
Nichols largely adopted a proposal that New York floated to him earlier in the week.
Lawyers for New York plan to argue that the Washington court lacks jurisdiction over it, requiring the case to be dismissed or at least moved to a federal court in New York. Under the court order issued Thursday, the prohibition on New York delivering Trump’s tax returns to the House will end a week after Nichols’ decision on the state’s motion to dismiss the president’s case. Nichols set a hearing for Aug. 29.
Nichols’ order late Thursday said New York must notify the court if the state does receive a request from the Ways and Means Committee for Trump’s tax returns.
Andrew Amer, a lawyer for New York, raised concerns this week that an order requiring notice could be perceived as a “waiver” of the state’s jurisdiction arguments. In his order Thursday, Nichols said New York must “promptly notify” him of any request from the House but he emphasized the state has “expressly preserved” its jurisdiction defense.
Douglas Letter, the House general counsel, had taken no position on New York’s proposal for handling the early stages of the case. In a joint filing with New York and Trump’s personal lawyer, William Consovoy, Letter argued that the House enjoys broad immunity that should shield it from the president’s lawsuit.
“We are pleased that the court has accepted our reasonable proposal for how to move forward in this premature lawsuit filed by President Trump. We look forward to continuing to make our case in court. This law is constitutional, and we will vigorously defend it,” Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement.
Trump sued the House Ways and Means Committee last month to prevent the panel from seeking his tax returns under the Trust Act, a New York law that allows the state finance department to provide those records to Congress. Consovoy has argued that the House lacks a valid legislative purpose for seeking Trump’s tax returns. He has also said the New York Legislature “enacted it to discriminate and retaliate against President Trump for his speech and politics,” in violation of his First Amendment rights.
A co-sponsor of the Trust Act, state Sen. Brad Hoylman, said in May that the bill was intended to give the U.S. Congress an additional oversight tool. “This is an important juncture in our history where we have a White House stonewalling Congress and preventing it from undertaking its oversight responsibility,” the Manhattan Democrat said.
Trump’s lawsuit is playing out against the backdrop of two other cases confronting the secrecy of his financial records. A pair of federal appeals courts are reviewing rulings, issued in trial courts, that upheld the ability of congressional committees to obtain records from Trump’s longtime lender, Deutsche Bank, and his accounting firm, Mazars USA. The House has also sued the Treasury Department over the administration’s refusal to turn over six years’ worth of Trump’s tax returns.
“I did not pick this fight, but I will not shirk it because it’s about something much bigger than tax forms,” Rep. Richard Neal, the Ways and Means Committee chairman, said in a Washington Post op-ed Wednesday. “This is not an exercise in political retribution: I am not willing to trade the reputation of the Ways and Means Committee for cheap political gains.”
Neal said his committee is considering legislation addressing how the IRS conducts mandatory audits of sitting presidents and vice presidents. “As part of our deliberations, we must review his tax information to better understand the audit program and propose any needed changes.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDiscover Hires Interim Legal Chief as $35B Sale to Capital One Faces New Hurdles
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
NY Antitrust Investigators Seek Subpoena in Probe of Potential Capital One-Discover Merger
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250