Demand for Law Degree Continues to Climb, Albeit Modestly
The number of law school applicants nationwide increased 3% this year, but the percentage of those with highest LSAT scores slid 20%.
August 05, 2019 at 02:27 PM
3 minute read
Demand for a law degree is still on the rise, but the so-called Trump Bump that helped fuel an 8% increase in law school applicants in 2018 looks to be tapering off.
The number of applicants to law schools accredited by the American Bar Association increased by 3.2% during the 2019 application cycle, which recently closed. This year, 62,487 people applied to a J.D. program, up from 60,536 in 2018, according to the Law School Admission Council.
While more modest than the previous year, the growth of this year’s applicant pool is still good news for legal educators. The size of the applicant pool fell 39% between 2010 and 2015, and remained relatively static until 2018’s sure of 8%. Thus, two years of sustained growth—cumulatively 11%—is a welcome development for law deans who have struggled with declining enrollment and resulting budget shortfalls.
However, the news was not as upbeat for elite law schools that compete heavily for students with top undergraduate grades and LSAT scores. The number of applicants with LSAT scores of 175 to 180—the highest possible—fell nearly 20% this cycle. But that score band represents such a small fraction of the overall applicant pool that the decline appears more significant than it really is for schools, said Law School Admission Council president Kellye Testy. The number of applicants with LSAT scores of 175 to 180 was still nearly 30% higher this cycle than it was two years ago, according to council data.
Still, that cohort of highest LSAT scorers should be monitored, Testy said. “It’s a number we want to watch because those students have a lot of choices about different fields they go into,” she said.
Overall, the 3.2% national increase in applicants signals that legal education has entered a period of stability, Testy said. “I think schools are feeling pretty content because they’ve set a target and have been able to reach it with the quantity and quality of the applicants they were looking for,” she said. “There is probably still some lingering hope that it will jump up again like it did last year, but I think people are just more realistic. There has been a greater understanding of the market and how we need to think about enrollment in relation to the employment market.”
The National Association for Law Placement last week reported that the Class of 2018 enjoyed the highest employment rate in a decade, largely due to fewer law graduates competing for jobs.
Not all schools saw their applicant pools expand. Data from the council shows that 84 schools had applicant increases, nine saw applicants stay the same, and 109 saw a decline in applicants. Each region notched an uptick in applicants except for the Midwest, which experienced a 1.4% decline.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUniversity of New Hampshire Law School Launches Specialized Health, Life Sciences Program
Supreme Court Takes Up Case Over Approval of Religious Charter School
The Week in Data Jan. 24: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trending Stories
- 1Who Is Nicholas J. Ganjei? His Rise to Top Lawyer
- 2Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 3Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 4Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
- 5Ex-Kline & Specter Associate Drops Lawsuit Against the Firm
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250