Facebook Can’t Dodge Privacy Case, Good-bye FBI, Hello Lawsuits, AI Inventors: The Morning Minute
Here's the news you need to start your day.
August 09, 2019 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here’s the sign-up.
WHAT WE’RE WATCHING
FACE OFF – A class action over Facebook’s facial recognition technology can move ahead following the Ninth Circuit’s decision that the social media site’s app could violate plaintiffs’ privacy interests. Amanda Bronstad reports that the appeals court unanimously affirmed class certification in the case alleging that Facebook’s feature called “Tag Suggestions” violates the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. Backed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Facebook had argued that the three plaintiffs, all residents of Illinois, lacked standing to sue because they suffered no harm.
FIRING BACKFIRE – First it was Peter Strzok; now it’s Andrew McCabe suing the DOJ over his ouster from the FBI. As C. Ryan Barber reports, McCabe, a former deputy director of the FBI, and Strzok, a top counterintelligence FBI agent, in separate suits this week claim they were canned at the behest of President Trump, who viewed them as partisan opponents. McCabe was fired just before his long-planned retirement, and was therefore denied retirement benefits. Not suing so far? Former FBI director James Comey, whom Trump also fired, in 2017.
THEY’RE COMING – We at The Morning Minute admit we’re a little paranoid about robots taking over the world. But then there’s this: As Victoria Hudgins reports, two patent applications recently were filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the European Patent Office and the U.K.’s Intellectual Property Office for a food container and light display. Listed as the inventor? An artificial intelligence machine. While lawyers say it’s unlikely the patent offices will allow the patents to remain as is, they note that the situation may spark conversation regarding innovations developed by software.
EDITOR’S PICKS
Federal Judge Blocks Claims That Political Animus Against Kushner Sank $900M Project
Rockefeller University Sues Insurers for Coverage of Past Child Sex Abuse Claims
Cross on County Seal and Flag Not Discriminatory, Third Circuit Says
How I Made Partner: Locke Lord’s Kyle Davis
In-House Cannabis Lawyers Should Help Shape Company Advertising Policies
ABA’s Legal Education Honcho Reflects on a Turbulent Tenure
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
CASH POOR - The Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales has been notified of a significant shortfall in client account money that contributed to the collapse of law firm Cubism, which closed its doors in July. Krishnan Nair reports that as part of its investigation into the collapse, the firm’s administrators are now working with the SRA following the discovery of an unexplained client account shortfall of about $303,000 Sources say the shortfall was a factor leading to the firm’s collapse. The client in question was a major U.K. franchisee of fast-food chain KFC, sources said.
WHAT YOU SAID
“I suppose it would have been a little nice if the folks who thought what we were proposing was a good idea were more willing to say so publicly.”
➤➤ Sign up here to receive the Morning Minute straight to your inbox.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStatute of Limitations Shrivels $5M Jury Award to Less than $1M, 8th Circuit Rules
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readArizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Goodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Court Rejects San Francisco's Challenge to Robotaxi Licenses
- 2'Be Prepared and Practice': Paul Hastings' Michelle Reed Breaks Down Firm's First SEC Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure Report
- 3Lina Khan Gives Up the Gavel After Contentious 4 Years as FTC Chair
- 4Allstate Is Using Cell Phone Data to Raise Prices, Attorney General Claims
- 5Epiq Announces AI Discovery Assistant, Initially Developed by Laer AI, With Help From Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250