Hundreds of Child Victim Suits Filed in NY; Lawyers Say It’s Just Beginning
More than 400 cases were filed under New York's new child-victims law, and plaintiffs lawyers say they have hundreds in the pipeline.
August 14, 2019 at 06:03 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
More than 400 lawsuits were filed across New York state against the Catholic Church, the Boy Scouts and other institutions Wednesday to mark the first day of a one-year window to file historic claims of child sex abuse—and plaintiffs attorneys said many more cases are in the pipeline.
Some 169 cases had been filed under the Child Victims Act in the five counties of New York City as of 5 p.m. Wednesday, according to a search of the New York State Court Electronic Filings system, a court records database. The Archdiocese of New York and other Catholic institutions were the defendants in the vast majority of them. Most suits were filed by a single plaintiff, but in some instances, more than a dozen victims sued together.
Lucian Chalfen, a spokesman for the state’s Office of Court Administration, said another 258 cases were filed outside of New York City. Erie County, home to Buffalo, saw 107 cases filed, more than even Manhattan. Albany recorded at least 32 cases, Onondaga County—where Syracuse is—at least 11, and Nassau County on Long Island another 30, the NYSCEF search showed.
Jeff Anderson, whose Minnesota firm Jeff Anderson & Associates represents victims of child sex abuse, said he had filed 262 lawsuits against Catholic entities across the state Wednesday that named some 60 never-before-named perpetrators of abuse. Anderson is working on the cases with lawyers including Robins Kaplan in New York, Steve Boyd in Buffalo and Cynthia LaFave of LaFave, Wein & Frament in Albany.
“The Child Victims Act opened up so many opportunities for so many survivors,” Anderson said. “As experienced as we are, we need some major firepower working with us.”
The cases filed Wednesday may be just the tip of the iceberg, according to Michael London of Douglas & London, a plaintiffs firm in Manhattan, who said his firm is investigating hundreds of potential cases against Catholic institutions and public and private schools across New York. There’s no reason “to rush to file today simply because they said go,” he said.
“It’s going to be a long process,” he said. “These are difficult cases. The evidence spans many years, decades. Memories can fade. … Our job is to corroborate as much as possible before we file.”
Jeff Herman of Herman Law sounded a similar note. He said his firm filed 20 to 25 cases under the Child Victims Act against various defendants Wednesday but said hundreds more were in the pipeline.
“I’m intentionally not filing a huge group of cases at once because I think it’s really important for victims to have a voice, and I don’t want those voices to be muffled,” he said.
John Bonina of Bonina & Bonina said some clients are eager to see justice served, however. He represents a group of seven plaintiffs whose suit against the Archdiocese of New York and other defendants appears to have been the first suit filed in Manhattan; he said it was filed at 12:03 a.m.
Other firms representing large numbers of victims in cases filed Wednesday include the Marsh Law Firm in White Plains, which has partnered with a Washington state firm to bring what they have pegged at 500 cases.
State court officials, for their part, have been preparing for the rush of Child Victims Act cases, training judges about the new law and assigning five judges to oversee pretrial proceedings in the cases.
|Read More:
Wave of Abuse Lawsuits Under New Child Victims Act Is Expected to Crest in NY
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250