Welcome back for another week of What’s Next, where we report on the intersection of law and technology. This past week, a Muddy Waters report hurling accusations at Burford Capital gave us a peek into the somewhat enigmatic litigation funding industry. Plus, we continue to unravel the potential issues facing facial recognition. And Michael Dreeben declares that the Fourth Amendment is not dead yet. Let’s chat: Email me at [email protected] and follow me on Twitter at @a_lancaster3.
![](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2019/08/unnamed-31.jpg)
Litigation Funding’s Muddied Waters
If you hear members of the legal community complaining about a crick in their necks, it might be from attempting to keep up with the accusations ping ponging between Burford Capital and due diligence-based investment firm Muddy Waters.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]