How I Made Partner: Davis Polk's Fiona Moran
"There is no substitute for hard work, and a solid team will put you in a position to make that hard work pay off."
August 15, 2019 at 01:37 PM
4 minute read
Practice area: Litigation.
Law school and year of graduation: University of Virginia School of Law, 2010.
How long have you been at the firm? Since the fall of 2010.
How long were you an associate at the firm? Nine years.
Were you an associate at another firm before joining your present firm? No.
What year did you make partner at your current firm? 2019.
What’s the biggest surprise you experienced in becoming partner? I was surprised by how much it meant to me to have an ownership stake in the firm. From the time that I joined Davis Polk, I have always had an interest not just in the practice of law, but also in the firm as a business. When I became partner I felt a sense of excitement and pride, beyond what I could have expected, about having a real stake in the future success of the firm.
What do you think was the deciding point for the firm in making you partner? It would be difficult to pin down one specific factor that led to my promotion. However, I do know that there are several attributes that have always defined a Davis Polk partner, including excellent legal skills, first-rate client service, passion about the firm, and a commitment to its success. I would like to think that the other partners saw those traits in me.
Describe how you feel now about your career now that you’ve made partner. Very excited. I am proud of the work that I did as an associate and appreciate the firm’s acknowledgment of those efforts. At the same time, I am now among the most junior partners in the firm. I look forward to learning from and working with my new partners to build my practice in white-collar defense and government investigations and to contribute to the overall success of Davis Polk.
What’s the key to successful business development in your opinion? Our clients expect top-notch legal representation, so a critical component of business development is putting forward the firm’s absolute best work product and providing the firm’s absolute best advice. But I think you most successfully serve a client when you take the time to understand their business motivations beyond the narrow confines of one legal matter. By appreciating the business context, you can provide more tailored advice, which helps to gain your clients’ trust and makes them more likely to call you the next time.
What’s been the biggest change, day-to-day, in your routine since becoming partner: It has been exciting to dive straight into my new responsibilities at the firm. For example, there are new management meetings, recruiting responsibilities, projects for my practice group and training. As a result, my calendar quickly went from full to overflowing. I have had to develop a new routine to manage my time even more granularly and efficiently.
Who had the greatest influence in your career that helped propel you to partner? As a mother of two children (going on three!), I have come to fully appreciate the notion that it takes a village to raise a child. I think the same goes for propelling someone into the partnership at Davis Polk. I am incredibly fortunate to have a diverse and successful team supporting my career, including both current and former Davis Polk partners.
What’s the best piece of advice you could give an associate who wants to make partner? Focus on building your team. It is certainly important to have mentors who can help guide you through strategic decision points in your career and think about the big picture. But it is equally important to develop relationships with mid-level and junior associates who you can rely on to help put forward the best work product possible. There is no substitute for hard work, and a solid team will put you in a position to make that hard work pay off.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
19 minute readHow I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About ,' Says Jennifer Gniady of Stradley Ronon
How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'Leaders Must Be Good Listeners,' Says Dan Summerlin of Woods Rogers
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250