Amazon General Counsel Contributed to Congressman's Re-Election Right Before Committee Investigation
General counsel David Zapolsky made a donation of $2,800 in May to Rep. David Cicilline, chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law. Amazon was involved in a subcommittee hearing two months later.
August 19, 2019 at 04:50 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The general counsel of Amazon.com Inc. and four other executives of the online retail giant made individual contributions in May to the reelection campaign of the congressman who is leading a subcommittee antitrust investigation into large technology companies.
First reported by CNBC, general counsel David Zapolsky made a donation of $2,800 May 21 to Rep. David Cicilline, D–Rhode Island, chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law.
A spokesperson for Cicilline said in an email to Corporate Counsel that when the hearing was scheduled in July, Cicilline made a policy to not accept political donations from those who may be subject to the hearing.
The hearing, and who would be testifying during it, was announced July 9, and the hearing itself took place July 16. Zapolsky did not testify during the hearing; Amazon’s associate general counsel Nathan Sutton testified on behalf of the company.
The other executives who contributed to Cicilline’s reelection campaign are Amazon’s CEO of worldwide consumer Jeff Wilke, chief financial officer Brian Olsavsky, senior vice president of worldwide operations Dave Clark, and senior vice president of North American consumer Doug Herrington. Herrington, Wilke and Clark all contributed $2,800. Olsavsky contributed $1,500.
A spokeswoman for Amazon said the executive donations were in connection with a fundraising trip to Seattle in which Cicilline visited Amazon’s campus. The trip was planned before the investigation and the hearings were announced.
“No legal ethics rule forbids the GC of a company from contributing to a political campaign, even one made on the eve of his congressional testimony,” Stephen Gillers, professor at New York University School of Law, said in an email to Corporate Counsel. “The only limitation, if one exists, would come not from ethics rules for lawyers but from a company’s policies, if any.”
Google, Facebook and Apple also participated in the hearing in front of the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law in July. CNBC reported that executives from Apple, Facebook and Google did not make any contributions to Cicilline’s reelection efforts this year.
Cicilline said in a July statement he was not satisfied with many of the answers he and the subcommittee received during the hearing. A week later he wrote a letter to Zapolsky seeking clarifications to Sutton’s live testimony.
“Although I appreciate Amazon’s participating in the hearing, I was troubled by Mr. Sutton’s responses to questions by Members of the Subcommittee,” Cicilline wrote in the letter to Zapolsky. “In several instances Mr. Sutton responded to questions from Members of the Subcommittee by offering either ancillary information or partial and selective responses.”
Cicilline wrote similar letters to Kent Walker, chief legal officer of Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company, and Jennifer Newstead, general counsel of Facebook. Cicilline attached a series of additional questions to each of the letters hoping to clarify some of the responses given during the hearing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJD Vance Has a History With Biden's Judicial Nominee for Northern District of Illinois
4 minute readCongressional Probes Often Catch Companies Off Guard. Is Your Company Ready?
9 minute readWhite-Collar Enforcement Is Finally Here in the Biden Administration
'Don't Sell Patients Procedures They Do Not Need': Miami Attorneys Secure $1.1 M Verdict from Dental Practice
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250