NYPD Officer Involved in Garner Death Is Fired
During a press conference in Manhattan on his decision, NYPD Commissioner James O’Neill said he struggled with the decision, but ultimately agreed to accept a judge’s recommendation.
August 19, 2019 at 12:51 PM
5 minute read
Daniel Pantaleo—the police officer involved in the death of Eric Garner, who was killed five years ago on Staten Island during an interaction with police—was fired from the New York City Police Department by Commissioner James O’Neill on Monday.
O’Neill’s decision comes in the wake of an administrative judge’s recommendation earlier this month that Pantaleo be removed from the force following an internal trial over the 2014 incident.
During a press conference in Manhattan Monday, O’Neill said he struggled with the decision, but ultimately agreed to accept the judge’s recommendation.
“I agree with the deputy commissioner of trials’ legal findings and recommendations,” O’Neill said. “In carrying out the court’s verdict in this case, I take no pleasure. I know many will take issue with this decision and that is their right.”
Garner, whose last words — “I can’t breathe” — became a symbol of the Black Lives Matter movement, was killed after being placed in a chokehold by Pantaleo. Garner was targeted for arrest after allegedly selling loose, or untaxed cigarettes, in a neighborhood on Staten Island.
Garner had initially resisted the arrest, which is when the officers became physical. The interaction ended in his death, which was preceded by warnings that he couldn’t breathe.
A video of the incident went viral shortly after Garner’s death, which spurred an investigation by both state and federal prosecutors. A grand jury declined to indict Pantaleo, and federal prosecutors said the evidence presented by the case wasn’t enough for a conviction on civil rights charges.
After an administrative trial over the incident concluded, Judge Rosemarie Maldonado recommended that Pantaleo be removed from the force. The department’s policy then mandated that O’Neill either accept or reject that recommendation. On Monday, he chose the former.
O’Neill, at times, appeared to empathize with Pantaleo’s case, which he said had been on his mind since he became commissioner in 2016.
“I served for nearly 34 years as a New York City cop before becoming police commissioner,” O’Neill said. “I can say if I had been in Officer Pantaleo’s situation, I might have made similar mistakes.”
Pantaleo had been on desk duty with the NYPD after Garner’s death until earlier this month, when he was suspended following the administrative judge’s recommendation. He’s represented by Stuart London, a partner at Worth, Longworth, & London in Manhattan. London did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
O’Neill, during his remarks Monday, framed the incident as the result of mistakes made by both Garner and Pantaleo. Garner, O’Neill said, shouldn’t have resisted arrest by the officers. But Pantaleo should not have kept his chokehold on Garner once he fell to the ground, O’Neill said.
“Every time I watch that video, I say to myself, as probably all of you do, to Mr. Garner: ‘don’t do it, comply.’ To officer Pantaleo, ‘don’t do it,’” O’Neill said.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, who was an outspoken critic of the city’s response to Garner’s death when she was New York City Public Advocate, said Pantaleo’s firing will fuel more advocacy from her office for additional changes to the state’s criminal justice system.
“While we will never be able to change the events that transpired or bring Mr. Garner back, today, some semblance of justice is finally being served,” James said. “In memory of Eric Garner and the countless others who have unjustly lost their lives, we will continue to fight for reforms to fix our broken criminal justice system and ensure that all of our communities feel safe.”
James was among the first public officials to call for a special prosecutor to be used in cases involving police misconduct. About a year after Garner’s death, Gov. Andrew Cuomo gave the New York Attorney General’s Office exclusive jurisdiction over cases where an unarmed civilian dies during an interaction with police.
While campaigning to be the state’s top lawyer last year, James released a legislative proposal that would have expanded Cuomo’s executive order. Under her plan, the Attorney General’s Office would have jurisdiction over other crimes involving police officers as well, like a sexual assault, even when it didn’t result in a victim’s death.
State lawmakers didn’t approve that reform this year, nor did they codify Cuomo’s executive order into state law, like he wanted. Cuomo said in June he’s planning to modify the executive order in some way, but has yet to provide details.
Rev. Al Sharpton, who has been active with Garner’s family in pushing for Pantaleo to be fired and criminally charged, suggested Monday after O’Neill’s announcement that state and federal lawmakers should make it illegal for police officers to use chokeholds.
“It ought to be a state law and federal law that chokeholds by police are punishable with a crime, not just termination” Sharpton said.
Public defenders were critical of New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s handling of the Garner matter in a statement released Monday afternoon. Tina Luongo, attorney-in-charge of the criminal defense practice at the Legal Aid Society, said the city should act differently if faced with another incident similar to what happened to Garner.
“This Administration and future mayors should learn and reflect from the mishandling of this entire tragedy and acknowledge the errors that sowed immense distrust and divisiveness in our city between the public and the NYPD,” Luongo said. “The Mayor’s legacy will have to bear this stain and all of its costs forever.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute readFederal Judge Sends Novel Damages Question in Employment Dispute to State Court
5 minute readCounty Reps: Appeal Likely Following State Court's Sales Tax Ruling for Retail Marijuana
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250