Due Diligence, Understanding of Laws Is Important for Publishing Cannabis Advertisements
In-house counsel and their employers in publishing should focus on working with cannabis customers who comply with state and federal laws and have strong internal policies on what goes into their advertising.
August 20, 2019 at 05:36 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Cannabis lawyers say publishers seeking to advertise for cannabis brands should have an internal policy on what kind of advertising to accept and do due diligence on their customers ahead of possible advertising regulations.
Chris Morley, an associate at Davis Wright Tremaine in the firm's cannabis practice, said publishers have built successful businesses prior to the widespread legalization of cannabis.
"That puts in-house counsel in an interesting position. Usually they'll get questions from their sales folks who are getting approached by the industry for ad buys," Morley said. "Management wants to know as well if they're leaving money on the table or not."
Morley said in-house counsel and their employers in publishing should focus on working with customers who comply with state and federal laws and have strong internal policies on what goes into their advertising.
The federal Controlled Substances Act, Morley said, has a few provisions related to advertising the sale of controlled substances. He said publishers are aware of these provisions, but they are not sure how they apply. The best way to steer clear of violations is to make sure an advertisement focuses on the cannabis brand over advertising the transaction.
➤➤ Get the latest cannabis law news and updates straight to your inbox with Higher Law, a weekly email briefing from Law.com. Sign up here.
While state laws vary, Nicole Phillis, an associate at Davis Wright Tremaine in Los Angeles, said California is beginning to look at ways to regulate how publishers advertise cannabis.
"In many ways I think California is a bellwether state to see how states are looking to regulate cannabis and CBD," Phillis said of the plant and its popular compound cannabidiol.
AB 1417 is one bill, she said, companies who publish advertisements in California should keep on their radar. The bill, which passed the Assembly and is making its way through the Senate, pertains to disclosure requirements for cannabis advertisements.
"What that bill seeks to do is to hold online applications and technology platforms responsible for posting advertisements created by third-party unlicensed cannabis vendors," Phillis said.
If the bill passes as is, there will be civil penalties associated with violating the law. Although right now, regulators have not been cracking down on publishers when it comes to advertising other companies' cannabis products.
"We haven't seen a significant amount of regulatory enforcement against publishers," Morley said. "Publishers want to do business with the cannabis industry but they want to do it the right way. We've seen a really strong effort to front-load compliance rather than wait and see and take some risk."
However, Phillis said regulators in California have launched a public information campaign called "Get #weedwise," which focuses on getting consumers to purchase cannabis from licensed businesses.
"I think regulators send out those types of signals before you see a lot of activity," Phillis said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow We Won: BraunHagey’s $56M Trademark Win Over Molson Coors Upheld by 9th Circuit
8 minute read'Immediately Stop Using' Pizza Puffs Term: Parties at Odds Over Judge's Injunctive Order Over Trademark
'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250