Trump DOJ Gets an Emoluments Win, How Lawyers are E-Duped, Aussie Infrastructure Boom: The Morning Minute
Here's the news you need to start your day.
August 22, 2019 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here’s the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE’RE WATCHING
APPEALING – In a win for the Trump DOJ, the federal appeals court in D.C. will now decide whether a lawsuit filed by Democrats in Congress alleging President Trump is violating the Constitution’s emoluments clause can advance. As Jacqueline Thomsen reports, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan has tossed out his own rulings that let the suit proceed following the DOJ’s request to allow the circuit court to review those previous rulings. More than 200 Democrats filed the lawsuit in 2017, and Sullivan previously found that the lawmakers had standing to sue and ordered the case to advance to discovery. Democrats issued subpoenas to several of Trump’s private businesses, including the Trump Organization, as a result of Sullivan’s rulings.
PHISHY – We know that law firms are particularly vulnerable to hacking because of the confidential client information they store electronically. But just how do attackers dupe smarty-pants lawyers? Pretty easily, Victoria Hudgins reports. In talking to tech experts, she identifies four phishing tactics bad actors use to sneak their way into your eletronic data. One way they do it is by taking advantage of the rigid hierarchy inside firms. Check it out.
SPOTLIGHT – Michael Avenatti is expected to appear in Manhattan federal court today for the latest hearing in a criminal case accusing the embattled attorney of waging a multimillion-dollar extortion plot against Nike Inc. Avenatti’s attorneys have filed a pair of motions asking Judge Paul Gardephe to dismiss the indictment, arguing that Avenatti was acting legitimately on behalf of his client when he threatened to go public with supposedly damaging information if Nike didn’t agree to pay a $22.5 million settlement or hire him to conduct an internal investigation at the company.
|
EDITOR’S PICKS
Schulte Roth Ex-Employee Sues, Alleging Sexist, Homophobic Remarks Made in Office
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
AUSSIE BIZ – Law firms in Australia are anticipating a huge increase in infrastructure work as major transport projects in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne get underway and disputes ensue, Christopher Niesche reports. Deloitte Access Economics, which forecasts economic activity, expects major project activity to reach a peak of around $15 billion in 2022, according to a report released earlier this month. The total recorded value of definite projects sits at $195 billion, while another $289 billion worth are possible.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
“If Brogan thought so little of me, I wonder what he thought about all the women that he paid even less.”
— JULIA SHEKETOFF, FORMER LAWYER AT JONES DAY, WHO, WITH HER HUSBAND MARK SAVIGNAC, IS SUING THE LAW FIRM OVER ITS PARENTAL LEAVE POLICY, COMMENTING ON STATEMENTS FROM THE LAW FIRM, OF WHOM STEPHEN BROGAN IS MANAGING PARTNER, THAT HER PERFORMANCE REVIEWS WERE MIXED.➤➤ Sign up here to receive the Morning Minute straight to your inbox.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250