Weedmaps Changes Advertising Policy Before Class Action Suit Is Filed
The lawsuit would have been filed by the Los Angeles-based cannabis firm, Zuber Lawler, and would have sought relief under California's Unfair Competition Law. The law prohibits false advertising and illegal business practices.
August 22, 2019 at 04:37 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
A cannabis technology company that allows users to review and discuss cannabis strains announced plans to no longer host advertising for unlicensed retailers on the same day a law firm planned on filing a class action suit against it for its advertising policies.
The lawsuit would have been filed by the Los Angeles-based cannabis firm, Zuber Lawler & Del Duca, and would have sought relief under California's Unfair Competition Law. The law prohibits false advertising and illegal business practices.
"That law is a powerful tool in our state to go after false advertising and illegal business conduct," Manny Medrano, a partner at Zuber Lawler, said Thursday.
However, on Thursday morning Weedmaps announced that starting later this year it will be restricting the use of its point of sale, online orders, delivery logistics and wholesale exchange software-as-a-service platforms to licensed operators exclusively. Weedmaps, which is based in Irvine, California, also announced it will require U.S. retail advertisers to provide a state license number on their listings.
"Weedmaps always has and will continue to advocate for a flourishing, legal cannabis market, and taking action to address social equity is integral to making that a reality. Today's announcement reinforces that commitment and outlines the program we are implementing to support minority entrepreneurs in the cannabis industry," Weedmaps' CEO Chris Beals said in an emailed statement to Corporate Counsel.
Beals said in the emailed statement that the company will also be working to help those who have not been able to participate in the legal market on how to get licensed in California.
Josh Masur, a partner at Zuber Lawler in the firm's Silicon Valley office, said he suspects that word about the pending lawsuit had spread among the cannabis community. He said the firm did not contact Weedmaps about the suit.
"Our inference is that word was getting around to more than just the people we wanted to talk to," Masur said.
There is not a timeline for when Weedmaps will begin the process of requiring companies who advertise on their site to show license numbers. However, Masur and Medrano said Thursday that they will be watching to see that Weedmaps makes the changes it promised. They said they will be prepared to file the suit if the policy changes Weedmaps announced do not go into effect.
"Our clients are intensely interested because of what the legitimate, licensed cannabis market means," Masur said.
Masur and Medrano did not say how many plaintiffs signed on and declined to give their names. However, they did refer to their clients as "significant players in the cannabis industry."
Advertising policies for the cannabis industry are stringent. While the substance is still illegal on the federal level, different states have guidance for in-house counsel and their employers on how cannabis can be advertised. There are also guidelines for those who publish the advertising, which include making sure the advertisements are not making false claims or marketing to those under 21.
One bill making its way through the California Legislature, AB 1417, if passed, will require those who publish cannabis advertisements to disclose the licensee's license number.
Read More:
Due Diligence, Understanding of Laws Is Important for Publishing Cannabis Advertisements
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow We Won: BraunHagey’s $56M Trademark Win Over Molson Coors Upheld by 9th Circuit
8 minute read'Immediately Stop Using' Pizza Puffs Term: Parties at Odds Over Judge's Injunctive Order Over Trademark
'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250