Law School: Yes or No? New Online Tool Helps Make the Call
The new MAX Pre-Law online program from AccessLex Institute walks would-be law students through every aspect of that decision, from whether or not to apply to which campus to choose and how to pay for it.
August 28, 2019 at 02:09 PM
5 minute read
With an average six-figure price tag and three-year commitment, going to law school is a weighty decision with a long-term impact.
But a new free, online program aims to help potential law students think through every aspect of that choice to determine whether or not law school is right for them. It also helps with choosing a law school, applying for it, and understanding the finances of getting a law degree.
AccessLex Institute has spent the past year developing the program, dubbed MAX Pre-Law. Its goal is to provide would-be lawyers with the information they need to manage their career expectations and weigh those against the cost of a law degree.
"We're not advocating that people go to law school," said Sherry Mason, director of pre-law services at AccessLex who oversaw development of the online program. "If the market for law school is only people who don't actually have the full story, that's a bad thing for the profession and the world. If as a result of getting full information someone makes a good decision not to go to law school, that's good news for us."
MAX Pre-Law is the latest in an expanding pool of online resources for those considering law school, including Khan Academy's year-old free LSAT test prep program and the Law School Admission Council's Discover Law campaign.
MAX Pre-Law is an outgrowth of an existing program called MAX by AccessLex that offers financial literacy education to law students, with an eye to loan repayment. That program, less than two years old, is now offered in about 140 law schools, Mason said.
But by the time law students go through the MAX program, they have already borrowed heavily. AccessLex aspired to reach prospective law students before they assume high debt to get a law degree, to help them make the best decision for their individual circumstances. (AccessLex Institute is a nonprofit organization aimed at increasing access to legal education through research and programming. It began as a private student loan lender called Access Group, but stopped issuing new loans in 2010 when the federal government expanded its direct loan program for graduate students.)
The program has four core lessons:
- The law school investment, which examines the user's personal goals.
- Paying for law school, which covers costs and the development of a strategy to pay for a law degree.
- The admissions process, with help on how to put together a successful application.
- Navigating the admissions and financial aid process.
Those lessons are delivered through a variety of means, including videos, worksheets and checklists. The program is designed to allow users to go in-depth on the topics that interest them, or just get an overview of the law school decision and application process, Mason said.
"Some people want their hands held and want a guide," she said. "Some people want really specific information. Some people want a way of organizing all the details that go with applying to law school or thinking about financial aid. We tried to create a collection of resources that would appeal to different kinds of learners in different kinds of ways."
Mason envisions that MAX Pre-Law will be particularly helpful for first-generation college students who may not have any lawyers in their families to help explain the application process and military veterans who are far removed from their undergraduate days and don't have access to pre-law advisers.
In addition to the wealth of online resources, each participant in the program is eligible for a free 30-minute phone counseling session with an AccessLex adviser who can walk them through issues such as choosing a school or negotiating financial aid offers. AccessLex also has a loan calculator that allows prospective law students to determine exactly what they would pay at each law school.
Mason, a former pre-law adviser, said there is a lot of misinformation out there and a lack of understanding of how the law school application process works. She said she frequently meets undergraduates at career fairs in January who say they plan to take the LSAT and apply to law school that spring—unaware that law schools begin taking applications in the fall.
"There are people who just don't know the rules of the game around rolling admissions and the financial and admissions impact they have," she said. "Helping spread the rules of the game to people who may not have lawyer family members or pre-law advisers who are giving them that information is a part of the mission."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Future of Law: Harnessing AI Without Compromising Integrity
- 2Largest Law Firms: Locations, Starting Salary and Clients By Firm
- 3Largest Law Firms: Firm Leadership and Practice Areas
- 4Largest Law Firms: New Jersey and Firmwide Attorney Count
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Marc Mandel, Senior Vice President & General Counsel at EXOS
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250