No organization or person is immune to fraud. Defined as a deliberate deception with the intent for financial gain, fraud can come in a variety of forms, making any duplicitous activity, at times, difficult to identify until it's too late. An estimate from the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners' (ACFE) "Report to the Nations, 2018 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse," states occupational fraud, also known as internal fraud, accounted for more than $7 billion in total losses globally within a 22-month period in 2016 and 2017. |
Types of occupational fraud
Between Jan. 2016 and Oct. 2017, the ACFE studied 2,690 fraud cases across 125 countries to determine how much occupational fraud affects companies worldwide. Of the three most common types of occupation fraud — asset misappropriation, corruption, and financial statement fraud — asset misappropriation, alone, accounted for 89% of cases in ACFE's study. Check and payment tampering, billing, and theft of noncash assets were the costliest sub-schemes of asset misappropriation, with each occurrence costing an organization between $98,000 and $150,000. In corruption cases, 70% were perpetrated by an individual of authority, such as a manager or owner/executive. While the median cost of corruption was $250,000 in the study, the longer an offender's actions went unnoticed, the higher the loss. Frauds that lasted six months or fewer experienced a median loss of $30,000; on the other hand, frauds that lasted more than 60 months resulted in a median loss of $715,000. |
How occupational fraud affects organizations
Nearly three-quarters of the frauds examined in the study occurred at for-profit companies, of which 42% were private, and 29% were public companies. Nonprofits experienced relatively small median losses at $75,000; however, given the limited resources and capital many have, any amount of fraud loss can be devastating to their operations and missions. An organization's size can affect both the opportunity for fraud and the ability to implement anti-fraud devices: "Larger entities typically have more resources to invest in their anti-fraud programs, as well as a greater ability to separate duties among staff members to help prevent fraud; however, the large staff size can also mean more potentially dishonest employees who might attempt schemes and more complex processes and transactions, which can increase the risk of fraud," the report states. As such, small businesses (fewer than 100 employees) suffered the largest median losses in the study — $68,000 more than organizations with 10,000 or more employees, and $100,000 more than companies with 100-999 employees. ACFE also examined cases based on the industry of the victim organization. The communications and publishing industry experienced just 24 fraud cases during the study period but at the highest median loss of $525,000. Meanwhile, the arts, entertainment and recreation industry suffered twice as many fraud cases but at the fraction of the loss. To find out the top 15 industries that experienced the greatest number of occupational fraud cases in ACFE's study, click through the slideshow above. Related: |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllProtecting insurance information through a natural disaster
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250