#MeToo Backlash Is Not Going Away
The Mike Pence rule is on its way to becoming the standard in the American workplace.
September 05, 2019 at 02:46 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
|
Let us not underestimate the wisdom of Mike Pence. Not only can he teach us about the essential art of sucking up (he made his boss very happy recently by staying at a Trump property in Ireland, even though it added hours of travel to his meeting place), he's the oracle of gender relations in the workplace.
You remember the Mike Pence rule, right? You know all that stuff about how Pence avoids being alone with a woman and how he never attends social events where alcohol is served without his wife? Oh, how quaint and silly was that?
Well, trivialize it at your peril, because the Pence rule is becoming the standard in the American workplace. According to a new study in the Harvard Business Review (the authors are Leanne Atwater, Allison Tringale, Rachel Sturm, Scott Taylor and Phillip Braddy), not only is the #MeToo backlash not quieting down, it's gotten worse in the last year.
Here are two depressing highlights, comparing 2019 with 2018 responses, based on data from 152 men and 303 women in a range of industries:
- 19% of men were reluctant to hire attractive women; in 2018, it was 16%.
- 21% of men were reluctant to hire women for jobs involving close interpersonal interactions such as travel; in 2018, it was 15%.
So not to make you feel you're living in 1965, there was some progress. For instance, in 2019, only 27% of men said they avoided one-on-one meetings with female colleagues; in 2018, it was a whopping 41%. But before you cheer that change, let this sink in: having 27% of men fearing being alone with a woman in a work context still stinks. Considering it's 2019, it's frick'n unbelievable.
Now, you might think that the legal profession is more advanced. Well, don't be so sure. Last fall, Working Mother magazine and the ABA Journal published a study with similar results: Most male lawyers—56%—said they were nervous about one-on-one interactions with women at work and the charges of impropriety that might result.
But let's go back to the study published in HBR. What intrigued (and disturbed) me were the responses from women. The 2018 women responses (the women's 2019 responses have not come out) show how much women have internalized and accepted the #MeToo backlash—sometimes even more than men:
- 15% of women said that they'd hesitate about hiring women for jobs that require close interactions with men, such as travel (same rate for men that year).
- 43% of women said that the more women who come forward about sexual harassment, the more likely it will be that men blame women for the problem, while only 30% of men thought so.
- 44% of women agreed that men will more likely exclude women from social interactions, while only 22% of men thought so.
- 57% of women said men will be more reluctant to have one-on-one meeting with women alone, while only 41% of men thought so.
And here's the big bummer: 11% of women said they'd be reluctant to hire attractive women! So much for sisterhood!
It's almost as if women are unwittingly participants of the #MeToo backlash. If we expect the worst—that there's hell to pay—are we helping to make it a self-fulfilling prophecy?
I don't know what the solution to the #MeToo backlash is, except to ride it out and press on.
In the meantime, though, may I make one simple suggestion? Let's assume there will always be Mike Pences out there, but let's not assume that they rule the world. OK?
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLess Is More: The Risks of Excessive Data Collection from Mobile Devices
6 minute readHow My Postpartum Depression Led to Launching My Firm’s Parental Leave Coaching Program
9 minute readProtecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250