Hugh Culverhouse Jr. and University of Alabama Make Nice
The leadership of the University of Alabama and the former law school donor have signaled an end to their very public dispute that led to the return of more than $21 million of law school funding and the removal of the donor's name from the law campus.
September 10, 2019 at 02:25 PM
3 minute read
The University of Alabama and its controversial law school donor Hugh Culverhouse Jr. appear to have buried the hatchet, three months after a public feud culminated in the removal of Culverhouse's name from the law campus and the return of millions of dollars.
Both parties recently issued a joint statement saying they "agree that they had different views regarding the future of The University of Alabama School of Law."
"On that basis, the parties agreed to the university's return of the Culverhouse donations made for the benefit of the law school as well as reverting to the law school's original name," the statement reads. "All other statements made by either party regarding the decision to return Hugh Culverhouse Jr.'s donations, or the removal of Hugh Culverhouse Jr.'s name from The University of Alabama School of Law are hereby withdrawn."
It goes on to say that neither university officials nor Culverhouse will comment further on the dispute. That terse statement is a far cry from the heated words exchanged publicly by Culverhouse and the university in May, when officials moved to return more than $21 million that the donor had given to the law school and strip his name from the campus.
The campus had been renamed the Hugh F. Culverhouse Jr. School of Law at the University of Alabama in September 2018, after the Florida-based attorney and real estate developer pledged $26.5 million. (Culverhouse had released more than $21 million of that amount when the spat occurred.)
But tensions arose between law school and university officials and Culverhouse in the ensuing months, according to correspondence later released by the university. Culverhouse clashed with law Dean Mark Brandon over the size of the law student body—he wished to see the school grow significantly, while Brandon worried that an increase would imperil the school's reputation. The emails also show that Culverhouse was unhappy with the candidates Brandon had assembled for an endowed professorship in constitutional law bearing his name.
But there was no public indication of problems until May 29, when Culverhouse called on out-of-state students to boycott the University of Alabama in protest of a new state law banning abortion in nearly every circumstance. He said his boycott call angered university leaders, prompting them to sever ties.
The university had a different take on the matter: Just days before Culverhouse released his call for a boycott, University of Alabama System Chancellor Finis St. John sent a memo to the board of trustees recommending the return of Culverhouse's entire donation and restoring the law school's previous name, the University of Alabama School of Law. The law school "will not be able to meet the donor's expectations and do not share the same vision for the future," St. John wrote.
A war of words followed, with Culverhouse saying the university's move to sever ties was in retaliation for his position against the abortion ban, while the university insisted it was prompted by Culverhouse's meddling in the law school's operations.
On June 7, the university's board of trustees voted unanimously to return Culverhouse's donation and remove his name from the law school.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUniversity of Chicago Accused of Evicting Student for Attending Gaza-Israel Protest
3 minute readSanctioned Penn Law Professor Amy Wax Sues University, Alleging Discrimination
5 minute readThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Trending Stories
- 1Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 1—Managing Risk
- 3Change Is Coming to the EEOC—But Not Overnight
- 4Med Mal Defense Win Stands as State Appeals Court Rejects Arguments Over Blocked Cross-Examination
- 5Rejecting 'Blind Adherence to Outdated Precedent,’ US Judge Goes His Own Way on Attorney Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250