Hugh Culverhouse Jr. and University of Alabama Make Nice
The leadership of the University of Alabama and the former law school donor have signaled an end to their very public dispute that led to the return of more than $21 million of law school funding and the removal of the donor's name from the law campus.
September 10, 2019 at 02:25 PM
3 minute read
|
The University of Alabama and its controversial law school donor Hugh Culverhouse Jr. appear to have buried the hatchet, three months after a public feud culminated in the removal of Culverhouse's name from the law campus and the return of millions of dollars.
Both parties recently issued a joint statement saying they "agree that they had different views regarding the future of The University of Alabama School of Law."
"On that basis, the parties agreed to the university's return of the Culverhouse donations made for the benefit of the law school as well as reverting to the law school's original name," the statement reads. "All other statements made by either party regarding the decision to return Hugh Culverhouse Jr.'s donations, or the removal of Hugh Culverhouse Jr.'s name from The University of Alabama School of Law are hereby withdrawn."
It goes on to say that neither university officials nor Culverhouse will comment further on the dispute. That terse statement is a far cry from the heated words exchanged publicly by Culverhouse and the university in May, when officials moved to return more than $21 million that the donor had given to the law school and strip his name from the campus.
The campus had been renamed the Hugh F. Culverhouse Jr. School of Law at the University of Alabama in September 2018, after the Florida-based attorney and real estate developer pledged $26.5 million. (Culverhouse had released more than $21 million of that amount when the spat occurred.)
But tensions arose between law school and university officials and Culverhouse in the ensuing months, according to correspondence later released by the university. Culverhouse clashed with law Dean Mark Brandon over the size of the law student body—he wished to see the school grow significantly, while Brandon worried that an increase would imperil the school's reputation. The emails also show that Culverhouse was unhappy with the candidates Brandon had assembled for an endowed professorship in constitutional law bearing his name.
But there was no public indication of problems until May 29, when Culverhouse called on out-of-state students to boycott the University of Alabama in protest of a new state law banning abortion in nearly every circumstance. He said his boycott call angered university leaders, prompting them to sever ties.
The university had a different take on the matter: Just days before Culverhouse released his call for a boycott, University of Alabama System Chancellor Finis St. John sent a memo to the board of trustees recommending the return of Culverhouse's entire donation and restoring the law school's previous name, the University of Alabama School of Law. The law school "will not be able to meet the donor's expectations and do not share the same vision for the future," St. John wrote.
A war of words followed, with Culverhouse saying the university's move to sever ties was in retaliation for his position against the abortion ban, while the university insisted it was prompted by Culverhouse's meddling in the law school's operations.
On June 7, the university's board of trustees voted unanimously to return Culverhouse's donation and remove his name from the law school.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250