Nearly Half of U.K. Lawyers Experience Work-Related Mental Illness
The surprisingly high numbers come as three-quarters say they feel under pressure to work extended hours, Legal Week's inaugural job satisfaction survey reveals.
September 10, 2019 at 05:36 AM
6 minute read
|
Nearly half of the U.K.'s top lawyers have experienced mental health-related illnesses, such as depression and stress, due to their work, Legal Week's job satisfaction survey has found.
Forty-four percent said they had suffered such illness, with more than half of female respondents saying they had, the survey of 248 commercial lawyers found. Levels of illness were also more common among lawyers under the age of 30 and those working in large firms with more than 1,000 lawyers.
"Being a lawyer is the most stressful yet boring job in the world," said one female lawyer at a large international firm. "I'd never recommend it to anyone. Ever."
The findings come as four in 10 lawyers said they work more than 50 hours every week, and 37% admitted to having worked at least one all-nighter in the past year.
Among men, nearly half (47%) claimed to work more than 50 hours, with one in seven saying they exceed the 60-hour mark. For women, more than a third (34%) admitted working more than 50 hours and 9% said they breached the 60-hour mark.
Even among parents, 42% said they work more than 50 hours a week.
Multiple submissions for the survey referenced the detrimental impact of a "long hours culture," the fixation with billable hours and the pressure that came from managing client expectations.
One male lawyer in his 30s at a midsize firm commented: "The better you perform the more in demand you are from clients and internally. This means more hours. It feels like success at work directly leads to a worsening home life and work/life balance. The worst lawyers in our firm have the best lifestyle."
|Billable Hour Under Fire
When asked what one thing they would change about the profession, the most common theme by far from respondents related to work-life balance issues.
There were calls for "more humane timelines and hours," "realistic deadlines" and "acceptance of fixed work hours," as many claimed the billable hour model actively encouraged inefficiency.
One salaried partner at a large London-based law firm stated that the focus on billable hours "severely adversely affects mental health and makes it very hard for lawyers to switch off and enjoy down time."
In total, 74% of the respondents from across the industry said they feel under pressure to work beyond their contracted hours in order to justify their position, with nearly one-third claiming that they actively dislike their job.
Lawyers working in-house, however, appeared to be generally more positive about their jobs, with 35% of them feeling very positive about their role, compared with 20% at law firms.
One lawyer at a small London-based firm likened their working environment to that of a factory.
"You are required to get the work in and out and quickly as possible and on time," they said. "This is no matter how much work you have—no consideration is given for the amount of work you have and urgency. Everything must be responded to within 48 hours."
On the subject of client expectations, one solicitor said: "We are at the complete mercy of clients, to the detriment of our own health and wellness."
Younger lawyers felt particularly affected—79% of those under 30 felt pressured to work overtime, and half said they've suffered illnesses because of this work.
This work and stress seems to have filtered through into their perception of law. Younger lawyers were the most disillusioned about their work, with just 42% saying they liked their job, compared with 61% of those over 40.
According to one male trainee, his U.S.-based firm has "no respect for holiday, no respect for not being on emails whilst away, no perks [and] no days in lieu."
One lawyer at one of the U.K.'s top firms described the firm's culture as "toxic and hypocritical," adding it was "always banging on about diversity, mental health support and whatever policy makes the firm look 'good' to the outside world. In fact, there is a culture of bullying, discrimination and total lack of respect for its employees. Partner profits are the top priority for this firm."
|Industry Approach 'Not Really Working'
A lawyer in their 30s at a large law firm demanded that there "must be a better focus on recognizing and decreasing anxiety and depression."
"As part of that, there needs to be more flexible working arrangements with reduced hours and flexi-contracts, and hence increasing the number of women—and more 'well-balanced' men, rather than sociopaths and workaholics—in more senior roles," they said.
According to some respondents, the impact of the hours and stress could ultimately put younger generations off the industry. As one older solicitor concluded: "I have had a good career in the law, but year on year it gets more pressurized.
"I do wonder what the attraction will be to young people coming into the profession going forward," they said.
Jonathan Moult, a former banking partner at Simmons & Simmons turned psychologist at Moult Coppin, commented that the fallout from a long-hours, high-stress environment are unsurprising.
"We're human beings. If we remain in a chronically stressful situation for extended periods, we will all feel the effects and the distress and possibly we'll act out to compensate; it may well taint our experience of work and life," he said. "The problem is not being realistic about how hard people work and its impact over time, if left unattended."
Moult, who runs a private psychology and psychotherapy practice aimed at London workers, with colleague Jonathan Coppin, argues that firms' response to stress and depression is currently too reactive, waiting for employees themselves to identify a "problem" and seek help.
"That's the medical model—waiting for a person to put their hand up—that there's something wrong that needs fixing," Moult said.
"It's suggesting: 'You're not coping, something's gone wrong and now we've got to treat it.' That approach is not really working at the moment."
Moult suggests that instead of reacting to problems as they arise, firms may need to think about taking a more proactive approach by organizing sessions with a psychologist for lawyers at certain points in their careers, on an opt-out rather than opt-in basis. The aim, he says, is to "help destigmatize any notions that you only get to talk to a someone when you're not coping."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250