What's Next for Ousted Kirkland Alum John Bolton?
Kirkland & Ellis is keeping mum on whether Trump's newly departed national security adviser could return to the firm.
September 11, 2019 at 04:22 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The abrupt end to John Bolton's tenure as national security adviser made headlines for what it means for the Trump Administration and for the country's foreign policy. But where does it leave Bolton himself?
Based on his past private sector experience—as of counsel at Kirkland & Ellis and as a think-tanker and regular Fox News talking head—the outspoken foreign policy hawk and former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations most likely has plenty of options.
Prior to entering the White House, Bolton was frequent denizen of Washington greenrooms and a familiar face in the halls of the capital's right-leaning think tanks. According to a disclosure filed by Bolton upon entering government, he spent a decade at Fox News after his time in the George W. Bush administration, earning more than $569,000 as a contributor from 2017 through May 2018. He worked at the American Enterprise Institute from 2007 to 2018, drawing earnings of $240,000 in the year-plus covered by his government disclosure, on top of a wealth of speaking fees.
Bolton didn't report any income from Kirkland & Ellis during the year and change before his appointment as national security adviser. He was of counsel at the firm from 2008 until joining the administration in April of 2018. Bolton began his legal career as an associate in the Washington, D.C., office of Covington & Burling.
What was Bolton doing at Kirkland? When he arrived in 2008, in the wake of his turn as U.S. ambassador to the U.N., the firm told the Chicago Tribune that he was brought in to "focus on counseling clients on domestic and international issues in complex corporate, litigation, internal investigations, regulatory and competition matters." The only federal litigation in which he made an appearance there was as counsel to Siemens of France in a battle with the Republic of Iraq over alleged collusion with Saddam Hussein in the U.N's scandal-plagued oil for food program.
Kirkland—one of the top feeder firms for Trump administration lawyers—did not respond to request for comment on whether it would invite Bolton back into its ranks. As for other firms that might welcome him, should he be seeking a law firm perch, it's anyone's guess at this point. Among the firms that have eagerly scooped up Trump administration alums is Michael Best & Friedrich, which is home to former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus and former deputy White House counsel Stefan Passantino, who signed Bolton's disclosure. But there's no indication the firm is courting Bolton.
Bolton could also look to return to the American Enterprise Institute, which looks to be in growth mode. AEI added former House Speaker Paul Ryan on Tuesday, following the hiring of two full-time scholars in its social, cultural and constitutional studies research division late last month. AEI's scholars have taken notice of Bolton's exit from Trump's White House, and posted video of an AEI vice president talking on cable news about Bolton's departure on AEI's website.
If Bolton decides not to return to one of his former homes, there ought to plenty of other opportunities available to him given the appetite for lawyers and ex-administration officials with national security experience in Washington.
Earlier this week, former FBI chief of staff Zack Harmon returned to King & Spalding and reunited with other former federal government officials into the firm's growing national security offerings. Administration insiders with experience in the sanctions space or working before the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States have also been a hot commodity in recent months. As a key administration player whose concerns ranged from Iran to Venezuela, Bolton's advice could be in demand with the clients of several Big Law firms in D.C.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250