What's Up With Andrew Yang and the Asian Stereotype?
All this fuss also shows that jokes shared within certain racial/ethnic groups won't translate well to a larger audience.
September 13, 2019 at 04:20 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
It's the start of the school year—so pop quiz time!
Hope you prepared for it by watching the latest Democratic presidential debates in Houston.
But no worries. I won't ask you anything difficult, like the policy differences between Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. Or whether Julian Castro has a penchant for bullying harmless old people like Joe Biden.
I'm asking a super-easy question and it's multiple choice, so you can't fail. It's about your opinion of presidential aspirant—and one-time Davis Polk & Wardwell associate—Andrew Yang and use of Asian stereotypes. (I'm not getting into Yang's $1,000 per month prize giveaway to families—which is way too complicated for today's quiz.)
Specifically, I'm focused on this statement by Yang during the debate on health care: "Now, I am Asian, so I know a lot of doctors." (He was trying to show that he understood the challenges faced by health professionals.)
So how would you describe Yang's comment:
a) cute/clever
b) cringeworthy
c) meh
Based on my highly scientific poll of eight or nine Asian American lawyers that I know, I'd say the review was mixed.
On the positive side, one lawyer says she "loved this line and many other aspects of his debate performance." Another called it "hilarious" because it hit home, as she's married to a Chinese American doctor.
But some were emphatically negative: "My reaction: STOP!!!!!!!!!!! I want Andrew to find a way to embrace his Asian American identity without promoting stereotypes." Another texted me: "I was like, plz no plz! I cringed so hard."
In the Twittersphere, the negative comments were flying. Some flat-out called him racist for playing up the Model Minority stereotype. Others said he was being insulting to Asians who don't know a lot of doctors. Comedian Terrence Williams tweeted about Yang's comment: "I'm BLACK SO I know a lot of People that make Fried Chicken!"
Whoa. Can we chill for a moment?
Personally, I didn't find the content cringeworthy (it was ironic, OK?), though the delivery arguably was. Yang kind of laid an egg on the debate stage—the audience didn't laugh.
" He said it tongue in cheek but since his delivery was so deadpan I think most people did not understand his attempt to be humorous," sums up an Asian American lawyer in California. "I didn't think it was particularly funny, but appreciated his attempt to inject some levity into a pretty dull debate on health care."
That's also the view of an Asian American lawyer in the Midwest who thought Yang's doctor comment "was mild and OK," adding, "Overall, he seems to say it with a wink and a smile, so it comes off as self-deprecating and jokey, which has the slight benefit of humanizing him."
"Slight" also means it could tip to the opposite side. "I think Andrew Yang was playing with fire by using such one-liners on the national stage," says a Big Law Asian American partner in New York, noting that Kamala Harris made a similar blunder about smoking marijuana in her youth when she said: "Half my family's from Jamaica. Are you kidding me?"
All this fuss also shows that jokes shared within certain racial/ethnic groups won't translate well to a larger audience. "Andrew's comment was the type that we Asian Americans might make at a dinner party, but not in 'mixed company' and definitely not on national TV," says one of the lawyers.
Well, this is getting complicated—and who has time for that?
So let me simplify things: If you're in politics, you can't make jokes about race—even if it's at your own expense.
Not much fun, is there?
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFired by Trump, EEOC's First Blind GC Lands at Nonprofit Targeting Abuses of Power
3 minute read'Erroneous Rulings'?: Wilmer Asks 4th Circuit to Overturn Mosby's Criminal Convictions
3 minute readLSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
7 minute readZoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250