What's Up With Andrew Yang and the Asian Stereotype?
All this fuss also shows that jokes shared within certain racial/ethnic groups won't translate well to a larger audience.
September 13, 2019 at 04:20 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
|
It's the start of the school year—so pop quiz time!
Hope you prepared for it by watching the latest Democratic presidential debates in Houston.
But no worries. I won't ask you anything difficult, like the policy differences between Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. Or whether Julian Castro has a penchant for bullying harmless old people like Joe Biden.
I'm asking a super-easy question and it's multiple choice, so you can't fail. It's about your opinion of presidential aspirant—and one-time Davis Polk & Wardwell associate—Andrew Yang and use of Asian stereotypes. (I'm not getting into Yang's $1,000 per month prize giveaway to families—which is way too complicated for today's quiz.)
Specifically, I'm focused on this statement by Yang during the debate on health care: "Now, I am Asian, so I know a lot of doctors." (He was trying to show that he understood the challenges faced by health professionals.)
So how would you describe Yang's comment:
a) cute/clever
b) cringeworthy
c) meh
Based on my highly scientific poll of eight or nine Asian American lawyers that I know, I'd say the review was mixed.
On the positive side, one lawyer says she "loved this line and many other aspects of his debate performance." Another called it "hilarious" because it hit home, as she's married to a Chinese American doctor.
But some were emphatically negative: "My reaction: STOP!!!!!!!!!!! I want Andrew to find a way to embrace his Asian American identity without promoting stereotypes." Another texted me: "I was like, plz no plz! I cringed so hard."
In the Twittersphere, the negative comments were flying. Some flat-out called him racist for playing up the Model Minority stereotype. Others said he was being insulting to Asians who don't know a lot of doctors. Comedian Terrence Williams tweeted about Yang's comment: "I'm BLACK SO I know a lot of People that make Fried Chicken!"
Whoa. Can we chill for a moment?
Personally, I didn't find the content cringeworthy (it was ironic, OK?), though the delivery arguably was. Yang kind of laid an egg on the debate stage—the audience didn't laugh.
" He said it tongue in cheek but since his delivery was so deadpan I think most people did not understand his attempt to be humorous," sums up an Asian American lawyer in California. "I didn't think it was particularly funny, but appreciated his attempt to inject some levity into a pretty dull debate on health care."
That's also the view of an Asian American lawyer in the Midwest who thought Yang's doctor comment "was mild and OK," adding, "Overall, he seems to say it with a wink and a smile, so it comes off as self-deprecating and jokey, which has the slight benefit of humanizing him."
"Slight" also means it could tip to the opposite side. "I think Andrew Yang was playing with fire by using such one-liners on the national stage," says a Big Law Asian American partner in New York, noting that Kamala Harris made a similar blunder about smoking marijuana in her youth when she said: "Half my family's from Jamaica. Are you kidding me?"
All this fuss also shows that jokes shared within certain racial/ethnic groups won't translate well to a larger audience. "Andrew's comment was the type that we Asian Americans might make at a dinner party, but not in 'mixed company' and definitely not on national TV," says one of the lawyers.
Well, this is getting complicated—and who has time for that?
So let me simplify things: If you're in politics, you can't make jokes about race—even if it's at your own expense.
Not much fun, is there?
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250